ArticleBMJ evidence-based medicine2025
Identifying and counteracting fraudulent responses in online recruitment for health research: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ evidence-based medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Web-Based Virtual Environment Behavioral Intervention as Cardiovascular Disease and Metabolic Disease Prevention Education in Persons With HIV: Evaluation of the LEARN Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- An evaluation of paid social media advertising and traditional advertising for addiction research recruitment.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2025Trial
- Practical Fraud Detection and Prevention in Incentivized Online Surveys: Secondary Analysis of the ADOPT Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Battling the Bots and Defending Against Fraudulent Responses in an International Community-Engaged Web-Based Survey With People Living With Long COVID: Methodological Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Safeguarding Online Research in Eating Disorders Against Fraud: Increasing Risks and Practical Recommendations.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Procedures to Verify Legitimacy and Uniqueness of Responses in an Online Study with U.S. Young Gay and Bisexual Men Who Use Stimulants.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Lessons learned from longitudinal biomonitoring and birth cohort studies: informing the future of reproductive health research in Canada.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2026Article
- Closing the Gap to Interventions for Tuberous Sclerosis Complex-Associated Neuropsychiatric Disorders (TAND): Protocol for a Longitudinal Study of TAND Severity, Predictors, and Caregiver Well-Being (TANDem-2).JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Imposter Participants in Online Nursing Research: Prevalence, Red Flags, and Risk Mitigation Strategies.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Willingness to Share Internet Use Data for Research on Early Disease Detection: Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Top 10 research priorities for adolescent and young adult cancer in Canada: a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
- Integrating real-time polling into modified Delphi methodology: lessons from a consensus study on cardiac implantable electronic device remote monitoring.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Early Childhood Behavioral and Social-Emotional Development Among Asian Indian, Filipino, and Korean Families in the United States: A Pilot Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Let's Talk aBOT Scam Online Survey Completions in Health Behavior Research: Tutorial With Case Studies, Practical Guidance, and a Checklist for Researchers.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Can co-designed educational interventions help consumers think critically about asking ChatGPT health questions? Results from a randomised-controlled trial.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Using a community-based online incentivized survey to describe the healthcare and school-based care of adolescents with functional seizures.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2025Article
- I have been scammed in my qualitative research.Research integrity and peer review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to describe how health researchers identify and counteract fraudulent responses when recruiting participants online.
designScoping review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Peer-reviewed studies published in English; studies that report on the online recruitment of participants for health research; and studies that specifically describe methodologies or strategies to detect and address fraudulent responses during the online recruitment of research participants. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: Nine databases, including Medline, Informit, AMED, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, IEEE Xplore, Scopus and Web of Science, were searched from inception to April 2024. CHARTING
methodsTwo authors independently screened and selected each study and performed data extraction, following the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodological guidance for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A predefined framework guided the evaluation of fraud identification and mitigation strategies within the studies included. This framework, adapted from a participatory mapping study that identified indicators of fraudulent survey responses, allowed for systematic assessment and comparison of the effectiveness of various antifraud strategies across studies.
results23 studies were included. 18 studies (78%) reported encountering fraudulent responses. Among the studies reviewed, the proportion of participants excluded for fraudulent or suspicious responses ranged from as low as 3% to as high as 94%. Survey completion time was used in six studies (26%) to identify fraud, with completion times under 5 min flagged as suspicious. 12 studies (52%) focused on non-confirming responses, identifying implausible text patterns through specific questions, consistency checks and open-ended questions. Four studies examined temporal events, such as unusual survey completion times. Seven studies (30%) reported on geographical incongruity, using IP address verification and location screening. Incentives were reported in 17 studies (73%), with higher incentives often increasing fraudulent responses. Mitigation strategies included using in-built survey features like Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart (34%), manual verification (21%) and video checks (8%). Most studies recommended multiple detection methods to maintain data integrity.
conclusionThere is insufficient evaluation of strategies to mitigate fraud in online health research, which hinders the ability to offer evidence-based guidance to researchers on their effectiveness. Researchers should employ a combination of strategies to counteract fraudulent responses when recruiting online to optimise data integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.