ArticleOncology research and treatment2025
New Insights from Long-Term Clinical Use of Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in Translocation-Associated Sarcomas.
Article in Oncology research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Signals Alongside Scans: A Genomics-Guided Framework for Liquid Biopsy in Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas.Cells · 2026Review
- From imaging to omics: deep learning is bridging MRI and liquid biopsy in bone tumor diagnosis.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAssessment of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a means to monitor disease activity in translocation-associated tumors has become very popular in clinical practice. However, there are still few studies on its clinical application to date. Our study evaluates the clinical applicability of ctDNA as a biomarker for monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with translocation-associated sarcomas.
methodsIn this retrospective study, we correlated 285 ctDNA samples from 34 patients diagnosed with translocation-associated sarcoma with the clinical course and images. Blood samples were collected at multiple time points during follow-up (median: 97 weeks, range: 7-398).
resultsWe discovered a significant association between ctDNA levels and the clinical course of the disease, particularly noting differences between patients in remission or with progressive disease (p = 0.001). Furthermore, although we noted that ctDNA levels remained undetectable in a few cases of unilocular recurrence (n = 3), they were consistently higher in patients with multilocular recurrence (n = 14; p = 0.008).
conclusionMonitoring ctDNA levels provides highly specific, additional information enabling early recurrence detection in patients with translocation-associated sarcomas during the follow-up and can be integrated into clinical practice. However, MRD monitoring by ctDNA quantification alone does not allow the reliable detection of 100% of unilocular recurrences and should be complemented by the use of conventional imaging techniques.
introductionAssessment of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a means to monitor disease activity in translocation-associated tumors has become very popular in clinical practice. However, there are still few studies on its clinical application to date. Our study evaluates the clinical applicability of ctDNA as a biomarker for monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with translocation-associated sarcomas.
methodsIn this retrospective study, we correlated 285 ctDNA samples from 34 patients diagnosed with translocation-associated sarcoma with the clinical course and images. Blood samples were collected at multiple time points during follow-up (median: 97 weeks, range: 7-398).
resultsWe discovered a significant association between ctDNA levels and the clinical course of the disease, particularly noting differences between patients in remission or with progressive disease (p = 0.001). Furthermore, although we noted that ctDNA levels remained undetectable in a few cases of unilocular recurrence (n = 3), they were consistently higher in patients with multilocular recurrence (n = 14; p = 0.008).
conclusionMonitoring ctDNA levels provides highly specific, additional information enabling early recurrence detection in patients with translocation-associated sarcomas during the follow-up and can be integrated into clinical practice. However, MRD monitoring by ctDNA quantification alone does not allow the reliable detection of 100% of unilocular recurrences and should be complemented by the use of conventional imaging techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.