Observational studyJMIR research protocols2024
The Use of "Cancer Ratio" in Differentiating Malignant and Tuberculous Pleural Effusions: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study.
Observational study in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferentiating between tuberculosis and malignancy as the cause of an exudative lymphocyte predominant pleural effusion is difficult due to similarities in the cellular and biochemical characteristics of the pleural fluid in both conditions. Microbiological tests in tubercular pleural effusions have a poor diagnostic yield, and the long turnaround time for results prevents an early diagnosis. The diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is hampered by a variable yield of pleural fluid cytology and closed pleural biopsy and the fact that thoracoscopy may not be readily available or feasible in each patient. A key gap in the existing knowledge is the performance of the serum lactate dehydrogenase to pleural adenosine deaminase ratio (ie, "cancer ratio"; CR) in differentiating between tuberculous and MPE in a high tuberculosis prevalence country like India, although its use has been well established in Western literature. The CR may find a practical application in the community health care settings in low-income countries without ready access to biopsy.
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the CR as a test to differentiate tubercular and malignant etiology in patients with an exudative lymphocyte predominant pleural effusion. Secondary objectives to be assessed include a comparison of CR to pleural fluid carcinoembryonic antigen in MPE and the association of histologic type of lung carcinoma to the CR positivity.
methodsThis hospital-based, prospective, observational study will include patients admitted with pleural effusion whose pleural fluid reports indicate a lymphocyte-predominant exudate. The ability of the CR to discriminate between tuberculous and MPE will be evaluated as a primary objective of this study. The performance of CR and pleural fluid carcinoembryonic antigen in the diagnosis of MPE will be compared using the receiver operating characteristics and area under the curve for both tests as a secondary objective. The association between a positive CR and histologic type of lung cancer will be analyzed as well.
resultsData collection began in June 2022. As of March 24, 2024, we have recruited 22 patients. Outcomes of the study are expected at the end of 2024.
conclusionsThe results of this study will provide an objective basis for the use of CR in differentiating between tuberculosis and malignancy as the cause of an exudative lymphocyte predominant pleural effusion. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/56592.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.