ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024
Machine Learning to Predict the Individual Risk of Treatment-Relevant Toxicity for Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive validation of machine learning models predicting chemotherapy related electrolyte disorders in a multicenter study.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- The impact of AI on modern oncology from early detection to personalized cancer treatment.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of treatment outcomes and quantitative analysis of contributing factors in fertility induction therapy for adolescent male patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Assisted Analysis of the Oral Cancer Immune Microenvironment: From Single-Cell Level to Prognostic Model Construction.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeToxicity to systemic cancer treatment represents a major anxiety for patients and a challenge to treatment plans. We aimed to develop machine learning algorithms for the upfront prediction of an individual's risk of experiencing treatment-relevant toxicity during the course of treatment.
methodsClinical records were retrieved from a single-center, consecutive cohort of patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment for early breast cancer. We developed and validated machine learning algorithms to predict grade 3 or 4 toxicity (anemia, neutropenia, deviation of liver enzymes, nephrotoxicity, thrombopenia, electrolyte disturbance, or neuropathy). We used 10-fold cross-validation to develop two algorithms (logistic regression with elastic net penalty [GLM] and support vector machines [SVMs]). Algorithm predictions were compared with documented toxicity events and diagnostic performance was evaluated via area under the curve (AUROC).
resultsA total of 590 patients were identified, 432 in the development set and 158 in the validation set. The median age was 51 years, and 55.8% (329 of 590) experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity. The performance improved significantly when adding referenced treatment information (referenced regimen, referenced summation dose intensity product) in addition to patient and tumor variables: GLM AUROC 0.59 versus 0.75,
conclusionThe individual risk of treatment-relevant toxicity can be predicted using machine learning algorithms. We demonstrate a promising way to improve efficacy and facilitate proactive toxicity management of systemic cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.