Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715466›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024

Machine Learning to Predict the Individual Risk of Treatment-Relevant Toxicity for Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment.

Lie Cai, Thomas M Deutsch, Chris Sidey-Gibbons, Michelle Kobel, Fabian Riedel, Katharina Smetanay, Carlo Fremd, Laura Michel, Michael Golatta, Joerg Heil and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lie CaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas M DeutschDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Chris Sidey-GibbonsMD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care (Integrated Systems for Patient-Reported Data), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-4732-7305
Michelle KobelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabian RiedelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katharina SmetanayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carlo FremdDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Laura MichelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7784-2826
Michael GolattaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2605-0060
Joerg HeilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas SchneeweissNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2429-4512
André PfobDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6140-9895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeToxicity to systemic cancer treatment represents a major anxiety for patients and a challenge to treatment plans. We aimed to develop machine learning algorithms for the upfront prediction of an individual's risk of experiencing treatment-relevant toxicity during the course of treatment.

methodsClinical records were retrieved from a single-center, consecutive cohort of patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment for early breast cancer. We developed and validated machine learning algorithms to predict grade 3 or 4 toxicity (anemia, neutropenia, deviation of liver enzymes, nephrotoxicity, thrombopenia, electrolyte disturbance, or neuropathy). We used 10-fold cross-validation to develop two algorithms (logistic regression with elastic net penalty [GLM] and support vector machines [SVMs]). Algorithm predictions were compared with documented toxicity events and diagnostic performance was evaluated via area under the curve (AUROC).

resultsA total of 590 patients were identified, 432 in the development set and 158 in the validation set. The median age was 51 years, and 55.8% (329 of 590) experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity. The performance improved significantly when adding referenced treatment information (referenced regimen, referenced summation dose intensity product) in addition to patient and tumor variables: GLM AUROC 0.59 versus 0.75,

conclusionThe individual risk of treatment-relevant toxicity can be predicted using machine learning algorithms. We demonstrate a promising way to improve efficacy and facilitate proactive toxicity management of systemic cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMachine LearningNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedAlgorithmsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisROC CurveSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID39715466
PMCPMC11670908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.