ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
MixtureFinder: Estimating DNA Mixture Models for Phylogenetic Analyses.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing Partition and Mixture Models with Akaike Information Criteria.Systematic biology · 2026Article
- GTRspmix: Capturing Heterogeneity of Exchangeabilities Across Sites to Improve Protein Phylogenetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- IQ-TREE 3: phylogenomic inference software using complex evolutionary models.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Longevity in plants impacts phylogenetic and population dynamics.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Evolution of a distinct chromatin regulatory landscape in brown algae.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Characterization ofViruses · 2026Article
- Experimental inoculation of pigs with porcine parainfluenza virus 1 revealed pathological manifestations in the upper respiratory tract.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Article
- Mycoheterotrophy and plastid genome evolution in the early-diverging epidendroid orchid tribe Nervilieae: independent transitions inAoB PLANTS · 2026Article
- Rhizorhina hamatipedicola n. sp. (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida: Nicothoidae) parasitic on a tanaidacean crustacean, with a note on the effectiveness of COI and 18S data in Rhizorhina taxonomy.Systematic parasitology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In phylogenetic studies, both partitioned models and mixture models are used to account for heterogeneity in molecular evolution among the sites of DNA sequence alignments. Partitioned models require the user to specify the grouping of sites into subsets, and then assume that each subset of sites can be modeled by a single common process. Mixture models do not require users to prespecify subsets of sites, and instead calculate the likelihood of every site under every model, while co-estimating the model weights and parameters. While much research has gone into the optimization of partitioned models by merging user-specified subsets, there has been less attention paid to the optimization of mixture models for DNA sequence alignments. In this study, we first ask whether a key assumption of partitioned models-that each user-specified subset can be modeled by a single common process-is supported by the data. Having shown that this is not the case, we then design, implement, test, and apply an algorithm, MixtureFinder, to select the optimum number of classes for a mixture model of Q-matrices for the standard models of DNA sequence evolution. We show this algorithm performs well on simulated and empirical datasets and suggest that it may be useful for future empirical studies. MixtureFinder is available in IQ-TREE2, and a tutorial for using MixtureFinder can be found here: http://www.iqtree.org/doc/Complex-Models#mixture-models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.