Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715265›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Detection and location of EEG events using deep learning visual inspection.

Mohammad Amin Fraiwan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohammad Amin FraiwanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-6352-5275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electroencephalogram (EEG) is a major diagnostic tool that provides detailed insight into the electrical activity of the brain. This signal contains a number of distinctive waveform patterns that reflect the subject's health state in relation to sleep, neurological disorders, memory functions, and more. In this regard, sleep spindles and K-complexes are two major waveform patterns of interest to specialists, who visually inspect the recordings to identify these events. The literature typically follows a traditional approach that examines the time-varying signal to identify features representing the events of interest. Even though most of these methods target individual event types, their reported performance results leave significant room for improvement. The research presented here adopts a novel approach to visually inspect the waveform, similar to how specialists work, to develop a single model that can detect and determine the location of both sleep spindles and K-complexes. The model then produces bounding boxes that accurately delineate the location of these events within the image. Several object detection algorithms (i.e., Faster R-CNN, YOLOv4, and YOLOX) and multiple backbone CNN architectures were evaluated under a wide range of conditions, revealing their true representative performance. The results show exceptional precision (>95% mAP@50) in detecting sleep spindles and K-complexes, albeit with less consistency across backbones and thresholds for the latter.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectroencephalographyAlgorithmsBrainHumansSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSleepSleep Stages

Identifiers

PMID39715265
PMCPMC11666049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.