Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715257›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

Current status of intestinal parasitosis and microsporidiosis in industrialized countries: Results from a prospective study in France and Luxembourg.

Maxime Moniot, Céline Nourrisson, Eloïse Bailly, Céline Lambert, Patricia Combes, Philippe Poirier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon spp. in Swedish patients with suspected gastrointestinal parasite infection: a cross-sectional molecular study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Occurrence and subtyping of the intestinal protozoanFood and waterborne parasitology · 2026
    Article
  4. Journal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Molecular evidence ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maxime MoniotService de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1471-6945
Céline NourrissonService de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Eloïse BaillyLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Céline LambertUnité de Biostatistiques, DRCI, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Patricia CombesCentre National de Référence Cryptosporidioses, Microsporidies et autres protozooses digestives (Laboratoire associé), CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Philippe PoirierService de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9173-2634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman intestinal parasitosis and microsporidiosis are a global health concern, mostly in endemic areas but should not be neglected elsewhere. Recent nationwide epidemiological data are scarce, especially from primary health care and developed countries. Diagnosis by molecular tools are increasing and several commercial gastrointestinal panel assays including protozoans and/or helminths are now available. These news tools improve the knowledge into real human parasite epidemiology. This study provides an epidemiological update on intestinal parasites found in primary health care in France and Luxembourg. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTwo thousand fifty-six stools from primary health care patients were analyzed for the presence of intestinal parasites (IPs) during two different seasons of 2022, the winter and the summer, corresponding to more than 1500 patients from all over France and Luxembourg. Parasite detection was performed combining standard microscopy (merthiolate-iodine-formaldehyde and Bailenger concentration procedures) with two molecular panel assays (AMPLIQUICK Fecal Pretreatment, AMPLIQUICK Protozoans and AMPLIQUICK Helminths, BIOSYNEX, France). The prevalence of IPs in primary care patients reached 33.2%. Blastocystis sp. and Dientamoeba fragilis were the most frequently detected parasites in 20.5% and 13.1% of patients, respectively. Coinfection with two or more parasites was detected in 9.9% of patients. For some parasites, patterns according to gender, age, geography or season have been observed. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The high prevalence of pathogenic IPs (about 7%) underlines the importance of investigating gastrointestinal disorders through parasite examination, even in developed countries. The detection of parasites, pathogenic or not, remains a marker of the faecal-oral route of transmission and results should be interpreted accordingly. Parasites molecular characterization give new insights and should encourage further research as industrialized countries are not exempt of parasitic circulation and a better survey is necessary.

Indexed as

FecesIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticMicrosporidiosisAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolDeveloped CountriesFemaleFranceHumansInfantLuxembourgMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39715257
PMCPMC11706478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.