ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024
Performance evaluation of nine reference centers and comparison of DNA extraction protocols for effective surveillance of Leishmania-infected Phlebotomine sand flies: Basis for technical recommendations.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- First epidemiological characterization of Leishmania tarentolae in sand flies collected in southern France and Corsica Island.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Comparative quantification of Leishmania infantum in experimental phlebotomine sand fly infections using kDNA and single-copy Meta-1 gene qPCR assays.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- The knowns and unknowns of phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in selected countries of Central Europe.Parasites & vectors · 2025Review
- External quality assessment for nucleic acid quantitative testing of human hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus in Chongqing, China: 2009-2024.Practical laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- First molecular evidence of Leishmania parasites in sand flies (Diptera: Phlebotominae) from Slovenia.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Updating the distribution of sand flies in Hungary with implications on their biology and ecology.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025Article
- Recent advances in Phlebotomine sand fly research: a review based on studies presented at ISOPS XI.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeishmaniasis, caused by Leishmania protozoan parasites transmitted by Phlebotomine sand flies, is a significant public health concern in the Mediterranean basin. Effective monitoring of Leishmania-infected sand flies requires standardized tools for comparing their distribution and infection prevalence. Consistent quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) parameters and efficient DNA extraction protocols are crucial for reliable results over time and across regions. However, the absence of standardized technical recommendations for Leishmania DNA detection hinders effective surveillance. This study aimed to compare different DNA extraction protocols and conduct a qPCR-based External Quality Assessment (EQA) through a multicenter study involving nine reference laboratories, with a focus on optimizing Leishmania DNA detection in sand fly. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsEQA samples consisted of Leishmania infantum and L. major species, at concentrations ranging from 101 to 104 parasites/mL. All but one center detected all concentrations, demonstrating strong diagnostic proficiency. The ability to detect low concentrations highlighted the robustness of the qPCR assay used, though variations in Cq values indicated differences in sensitivity related to technical capabilities or DNA extraction kit performance. A comparative analysis of seven DNA extraction methods identified the EZ1 DSP Virus Kit and QIAamp DNA mini-kit as the most efficient, supporting their use in standardized protocols. The study also assessed the effects of lyophilization and shipment conditions, showing no significant compromise in Leishmania detection despite slight variations in Cq values. Experimentally infected sand flies were included to simulate field conditions, and all centers successfully detected positive samples with varying Cq values, probably reflecting differences in infection load. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: This study emphasizes the importance of standardized DNA extraction protocols and continuous quality assurance for accurate Leishmania DNA detection. The results highlight the superior performance of certain extraction kits and the need for ongoing technical training, essential for reliable leishmaniasis surveillance, particularly in field settings with low infection densities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.