Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715219›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Optimizing hypertension prediction using ensemble learning approaches.

Isteaq Kabir Sifat, Md Kaderi Kibria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Isteaq Kabir SifatDepartment of Statistics, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh.
Md Kaderi KibriaDepartment of Statistics, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-3189-7012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension (HTN) prediction is critical for effective preventive healthcare strategies. This study investigates how well ensemble learning techniques work to increase the accuracy of HTN prediction models. Utilizing a dataset of 612 participants from Ethiopia, which includes 27 features potentially associated with HTN risk, we aimed to enhance predictive performance over traditional single-model methods. A multi-faceted feature selection approach was employed, incorporating Boruta, Lasso Regression, Forward and Backward Selection, and Random Forest feature importance, and found 13 common features that were considered for prediction. Five machine learning (ML) models such as logistic regression (LR), artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and a stacking ensemble model were trained using selected features to predict HTN. The models' performance on the testing set was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC). Additionally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was utilized to examine the impact of individual features on the models' predictions and identify the most important risk factors for HTN. The stacking ensemble model emerged as the most effective approach for predicting HTN risk, achieving an accuracy of 96.32%, precision of 95.48%, recall of 97.51%, F1-score of 96.48%, and an AUC of 0.971. SHAP analysis of the stacking model identified weight, drinking habits, history of hypertension, salt intake, age, diabetes, BMI, and fat intake as the most significant and interpretable risk factors for HTN. Our results demonstrate significant advancements in predictive accuracy and robustness, highlighting the potential of ensemble learning as a pivotal tool in healthcare analytics. This research contributes to ongoing efforts to optimize HTN prediction models, ultimately supporting early intervention and personalized healthcare management.

Indexed as

HypertensionMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAdultEthiopiaFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39715219
PMCPMC11666061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.