Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39715197›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

DC algorithm for estimation of sparse Gaussian graphical models.

Tomokaze Shiratori, Yuichi Takano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomokaze ShiratoriGraduate School of Science and Technology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Yuichi TakanoInstitute of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8919-1282

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sparse estimation of a Gaussian graphical model (GGM) is an important technique for making relationships between observed variables more interpretable. Various methods have been proposed for sparse GGM estimation, including the graphical lasso that uses the ℓ1 norm regularization term, and other methods that use nonconvex regularization terms. Most of these methods approximate the ℓ0 (pseudo) norm by more tractable functions; however, to estimate more accurate solutions, it is preferable to directly use the ℓ0 norm for counting the number of nonzero elements. To this end, we focus on sparse estimation of GGM with the cardinality constraint based on the ℓ0 norm. Specifically, we convert the cardinality constraint into an equivalent constraint based on the largest-K norm, and reformulate the resultant constrained optimization problem into an unconstrained penalty form with a DC (difference of convex functions) representation. To solve this problem efficiently, we design a DC algorithm in which the graphical lasso algorithm is repeatedly executed to solve convex optimization subproblems. Experimental results using two synthetic datasets show that our method achieves results that are comparable to or better than conventional methods for sparse GGM estimation. Our method is particularly advantageous for selecting true edges when cross-validation is used to determine the number of edges. Moreover, our DC algorithm converges within a practical time frame compared to the graphical lasso.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansModels, StatisticalNormal Distribution

Identifiers

PMID39715197
PMCPMC11666004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.