ArticlePloS one2024
Machine learning-based urban noise appropriateness evaluation method and driving factor analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evaluation of urban noise suitability is crucial for urban environmental management. Efficient and cost-effective methods for obtaining noise distribution data are of great interest. This study introduces various machine learning methods and applies the Random Forest algorithm, which performed best, to investigate noise suitability in the central urban area of Nanchang City. The findings are as follows: 1.Machine learning algorithms can be effectively used for urban noise evaluation. The optimized model accurately reflects the noise suitability levels in Nanchang City. 2.The feature importance ranking reveals that population spatial distribution has the most significant impact on urban noise, followed by distance to water bodies and road network density. These three features significantly influence the assessment of urban noise suitability and should be prioritized in noise control measures. 3.The weakly suitable noise areas in Nanchang's central urban region are primarily concentrated on the east bank of the Ganjiang River, making this a key area for noise management. Overall, the Unsuitable, Slightly suitable, Moderately suitable, Relatively suitable, and Height suitable areas constitute 9.38%, 16.03%, 28.02%, 33.31%, and 13.25% of the central urban area, respectively. 4.The SHAP model identifies the top three features in terms of importance, showing that different values of feature variables have varying impacts on noise suitability. This study employs data mining concepts and machine learning techniques to provide an accurate and objective assessment of urban noise levels. The results offer scientific decision-making support for urban spatial planning and noise mitigation measures, ensuring the healthy and sustainable development of the urban environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.