Trial reportClinical and translational science2024
Safety of BI 1358894 in patients with major depressive disorder: Results and learnings from a phase II randomized decentralized clinical trial.
Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Frequency, At-Home Monitoring of Drug Safety and Tolerability in Clinical Trials: Results From Studies of Fluvoxamine for COVID-19 Treatment.Clinical and translational science · 2025Trial
- Safety of BI 1358894 in patients with major depressive disorder: Results and learnings from a phase II randomized decentralized clinical trial.Clinical and translational science · 2024Trial
- The Silexan in the Treatment Of Posttraumatic stress disorder (STOP) trial: protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial of adjunctive Silexan for PTSD.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- Operationalizing Decentralized Clinical Trials: Technology Insights from the Trials@Home RADIAL Proof-of-Concept Trial.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Physiological functions and pharmacological targeting of transient receptor potential channels.Pharmacological reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The feasibility of conducting a fully remote, interventional, phase II decentralized clinical trial (DCT) was investigated in major depressive disorder (MDD). Key learnings were collated to improve future DCTs. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, DCT enrolled adult MDD patients with inadequate response to first-line antidepressant monotherapy (ongoing ≥8 weeks) and a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score (MADRS) ≥22 at screening. Patients were randomized 1:1 to BI 1358894 125 mg or placebo daily for 6 weeks remotely. Safety parameters, primary end point (change from baseline in MADRS at Week 6), and patient experience were assessed. The DCT was considered feasible if the trial protocol could be successfully executed. Overall, DCT procedures were successfully executed per protocol. However, despite achieving a vast patient outreach, the trial was terminated early due to deficient enrollment. Of the 136 patients who consented for enrollment and underwent screening, 45 were randomized and 43 received treatment (BI 1358894, n = 20; placebo, n = 23); 97.7% of patients completed the trial. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 42.2 (13.1) years and most (83.7%) were female. Adverse events were reported by 86.0% of patients (BI 1358894, 90.0%; placebo, 82.6%). Most patients (88%) reported a positive experience with the DCT. Key learnings related to the impact of stringent eligibility criteria, recruitment optimization strategies, plus the benefits and limitations of digital technologies. A fully remote, interventional DCT was feasible in MDD, and was well perceived by trial participants. Learnings related to recruitment optimization and trial design should be considered for future interventional DCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.