Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39714889›Full record

Trial reportJAMA surgery2025

Anterior Gastropexy for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Clayton C Petro, Ryan C Ellis, Sara M Maskal, Sam J Zolin, Chao Tu, Adele Costanzo, Lucas R A Beffa, David M Krpata, Diya Alaedeen, Ajita S Prabhu and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04007952 (Two-Armed Double-Blinded Registry-Based Randomized Control Trial Comparing Anterior Gastropexy to No Anterior Gastropexy for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04007952 nacompletednot on this map

Two-Armed Double-Blinded Registry-Based Randomized Control Trial Comparing Anterior Gastropexy to No Anterior Gastropexy for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair

TypeinterventionalSponsorClayton PetroRan2019 to 2024Enrolled240ConditionsParaesophageal Hernia, Hiatal Hernia LargeArmsAnterior Gastropexy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Gastropexy may reduce symptomatic recurrence in paraesophageal hernia repair: a Scandinavian retrospective multicenter study.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical Volume and Perioperative Outcomes of Hiatal Hernia Repair Within the Society of Thoracic Surgeons-General Thoracic Surgery Database.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  10. Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of crural reinforcement with bio-aHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. No advantage of fundoplication in paraesophageal hernia repair: a retrospective multicenter study.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Clayton C PetroCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ryan C EllisCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Sara M MaskalCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Sam J ZolinDivision of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Chao TuDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Adele CostanzoCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Lucas R A BeffaCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
David M KrpataCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Diya AlaedeenDepartment of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Fairview Hospital, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ajita S PrabhuCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Benjamin T MillerCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Kevin F BaierDepartment of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Fairview Hospital, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Alisan FathalizadehDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
John RodriguezDepartment of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Michael J RosenCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Paraesophageal hernias can cause severe limitations in quality of life and life-threatening complications. Even though minimally invasive paraesophageal hernia repair (MIS-PEHR) is safe and effective, anatomic recurrence rates remain notoriously high. Retrospective data suggest that suturing the stomach to the anterior abdominal wall after repair-an anterior gastropexy-may reduce recurrence, but this adjunct is currently not the standard of care. Objective: To determine whether anterior gastropexy reduces 1-year recurrence after MIS-PEHR. Design, Setting, and Participants: This registry-based randomized clinical trial was conducted by 10 surgeons at 3 academic hospitals within the Cleveland Clinic Enterprise. Between June 26, 2019, and July 24, 2023, 348 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 240 patients were enrolled and randomized. Statistical analysis was performed from January to March 2024. Intervention: Enrolled patients were randomized to and received either an anterior gastropexy (n = 119) or no anterior gastropexy (n = 121). Main Outcome: The primary outcome was recurrence as determined by reherniation of the stomach greater than 2 cm above the diaphragm on routine imaging at 1 year or reoperation. Secondary outcomes included quality of life as measured by the Gastroesophageal Reflux Health-Related Quality of Life survey, additional foregut symptom questionnaire, and patient satisfaction at 30 days and 1 year. Results: A total of 240 patients were randomized to either anterior gastropexy (n = 119; 104 [97%] women; median [IQR] age, 70 [64-75] years) or no anterior gastropexy (n = 121; 97 [80%] women; median [IQR] age, 68 [62-73] years) at the end of their MIS-PEHR. At 1 year, 188 patients (78%) had completed follow-up. By intention-to-treat analysis, 1-year recurrence was significantly lower in patients who received an anterior gastropexy (15% vs 36%; risk difference, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.09-0.33]), which remained significant after risk-adjusted regression analysis (hazard ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.23-0.60]). Of 13 reoperations (5.4%) for recurrence in the first year, 3 (2.5%) were in the anterior gastropexy group and 10 (8.2%) were in the no-gastropexy group (P = .052). Two patients (1.7%) had their anterior gastropexy sutures removed for pain. There were no significant differences in quality-of-life outcomes at 30 days and 1 year between treatment groups. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that the addition of an anterior gastropexy to MIS-PEHR is superior to no gastropexy in regard to reducing 1-year paraesophageal hernia recurrence. These results suggest that an anterior gastropexy should be routinely used in the context of minimally invasive paraesophageal hernia repair. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04007952.

Indexed as

GastropexyHernia, HiatalHerniorrhaphyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRecurrenceTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39714889
PMCPMC11904718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.