Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39714863›Full record

ArticleJAMA psychiatry2025

Association of State Cannabis Legalization With Cannabis Use Disorder and Cannabis Poisoning.

Jayani Jayawardhana, Jialin Hou, Patricia Freeman, Jeffery C Talbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jayani JayawardhanaDepartment of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Jialin HouDepartment of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Patricia FreemanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Jeffery C TalbertInstitute for Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Whether state implementation of medical and recreational cannabis laws is associated with increased cannabis use disorder (CUD) and/or cannabis poisoning among adults is not evident. Objective: To examine state-level medical and recreational cannabis laws' associations with CUD and cannabis poisoning, overall and by sex and age subgroups. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this longitudinal cohort study, state-level CUD and cannabis poisoning diagnoses from January 2011 to December 2021 were examined across all 50 US states and the District of Columbia before and after the implementation of medical and recreational cannabis laws (MCLs and RCLs, respectively) using a staggered adoption difference-in-differences approach. Event studies were conducted to estimate the magnitude of the association for each year-quarter relative to the time of each policy implementation. This study was conducted among all adults aged 18 to 64 years enrolled in the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, a database of employer-sponsored health insurance enrollees, with 1 year or more of continuous enrollment from 2011 to 2021. Data analysis was performed from January to August 2024. Exposures: State implementation of an MCL, opening a medical cannabis dispensary (MCD), allowing home cultivation of medical cannabis (HC-MC), and passage of an RCL. Main Outcomes and Measures: CUD and cannabis poisoning diagnoses per 100 000 enrollees per quarter. Results: This study included 110 256 536 enrollees, of whom 56 843 030 (52%) were female and the mean (SD) enrollee age was 41.0 (13.5) years. MCLs were associated with significant increases in CUD and cannabis poisoning by 31.09 (95% CI, 20.20-41.99; P < .001) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.52-1.00; P < .001) diagnoses per 100 000 enrollees per quarter, respectively, and RCLs were associated with a significant increase in cannabis poisoning by 0.34 (95% CI, 0.19-0.48; P < .001) per 100 000 enrollees per quarter in states with RCLs compared to states without these laws. No significant associations were observed for MCDs or HC-MC. Relative increases in CUD associated with MCLs were higher among female enrollees and among enrollees aged 35 to 44 years compared with male enrollees and other age groups, respectively. Sensitivity analysis results of 2011 to 2019 data were consistent with the 2011 to 2021 results. Conclusions and Relevance: In this longitudinal cohort study, MCLs were associated with increased CUD and cannabis poisoning diagnoses, and RCLs were associated with increased cannabis poisoning in adults aged 18 to 64 years with employer-sponsored health insurance. Communities with increased access to cannabis may experience increased health care use and costs due to increases in cannabis poisoning and CUD, and new clinical and policy interventions are needed to curb these rising diagnoses.

Indexed as

CannabisLegislation, DrugMarijuana AbuseMedical MarijuanaAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung AdultMedical Marijuana

Identifiers

PMID39714863
PMCPMC11883495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.