ArticleJAMA network open2024
Clinical Outcomes of Early Phenotype-Desirable Antimicrobial Therapy for Enterobacterales Bacteremia.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Approaches to Carbapenem-Resistant Infections in the ICU: Integrating Diagnostics, Stewardship, and Novel Therapies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluation of a direct method for detecting extended-spectrum β-lactamase using the Cica-beta test on positive blood culture bottles.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Beyond Accuracy: Methodological Advances for Assessing the Clinical Impact of Infectious Disease Diagnostics.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Lab efficiency and improvements in the management of bloodstream infections: a before and after study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Initiating effective therapy early is associated with improved survival among patients hospitalized with gram-negative bloodstream infections; furthermore, providing early phenotype-desirable antimicrobial therapy (PDAT; defined as receipt of a β-lactam antibiotic with the narrowest spectrum of activity to effectively treat the pathogen's phenotype) is crucial for antimicrobial stewardship. However, the timing of targeted therapy among patients hospitalized with gram-negative bloodstream infections is not well understood. Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes between patients who were hospitalized with Enterobacterales bloodstream infections receiving early vs delayed PDAT. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used a large, geographically diverse, hospital-based US database (PINC AI Healthcare Database). Participants were adult (aged ≥18 years) patients with an inpatient admission between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2022, with at least 1 blood culture isolate positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Proteus mirabilis and receiving PDAT on blood culture collection days 0 to 4. Exposure: Early vs delayed PDAT, with early PDAT defined as receipt of PDAT on blood culture collection days 0 to 2. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was desirability of outcome ranking, in which patients were assigned a mutually exclusive rank 1 through 5. Rank 1 indicated the most desirable outcome (alive with no events), whereas rank 5 indicated the least desirable outcome and included all patients who died within 30 days of blood culture collection. Results: Among 8193 eligible patients (mean [SD] age, 69.0 [16.4] years; 4758 [58.1%] female; 1200 [14.6%] African American or Black, 729 [8.9%] Hispanic, and 5778 [70.5%] White) from 252 hospitals, 5033 (61.4%) received early PDAT. Patients receiving early PDAT were similar in age (mean [SD], 68.2 [16.9] vs 70.3 [15.6] years) but more likely to have a lower median (IQR) Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score (2 [1-5] vs 3 [1-5]) compared with patients receiving delayed PDAT. After adjusting for comorbidities and severity of illness, patients receiving early PDAT were 20% less likely to be readmitted within 30 days compared with those receiving delayed PDAT (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.92; P < .001). A higher percentage of patients receiving early PDAT had a desirability of outcome ranking of 1 compared with patients receiving delayed PDAT (56.3% vs 52.2%, P < .001). Those receiving early PDAT had a 52.5% probability (95% CI, 51.3%-53.7%) of a more desirable outcome than those receiving delayed PDAT, a finding that persisted in the adjusted analysis (probability, 52.0%; 95% CI, 50.9%-53.2%). Conclusions and Relevance: Receiving early PDAT was associated with favorable 30-day clinical outcomes among patients hospitalized with Enterobacterales blood stream infections. Early PDAT may be important not only for antimicrobial stewardship but also for improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.