Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39714824›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2025

Blood-Based Biomarkers for Identifying Disease Activity in AQP4-IgG-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

Su-Hyun Kim, Ana Beatriz Ayroza Galvão Ribeiro Gomes, Patrick Schindler, Jae-Won Hyun, Ki Hoon Kim, Dong-Eun Lee, Vinicius Andreoli Schoeps, Aline de Moura Brasil Matos, Natalia Trombini Mendes, Samira Luisa Dos Apóstolos-Pereira and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Use of Fluid Biomarkers in NMOSD and MOGAD: Clinical and Research Applications.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neuroglial markers of damage in autoimmune neurology.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Su-Hyun KimDepartment of Neurology, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Ana Beatriz Ayroza Galvão Ribeiro GomesDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Patrick SchindlerDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jae-Won HyunDepartment of Neurology, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Ki Hoon KimDepartment of Neurology, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Dong-Eun LeeBiostatistics Collaboration Team, Research Core Center, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Vinicius Andreoli SchoepsDepartamento de Neurologia, Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Aline de Moura Brasil MatosDepartamento de Neurologia, Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Natalia Trombini MendesDepartamento de Neurologia, Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Samira Luisa Dos Apóstolos-PereiraDepartamento de Neurologia, Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Dagoberto CallegaroDepartamento de Neurologia, Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Jasmine LernerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Pascal BenkertDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jens KuhleDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Klemens RuprechtDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Friedemann PaulDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anne-Katrin PröbstelDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ho Jin KimDepartment of Neurology, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The temporal dynamics of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) and serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) as biomarkers of disease activity for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) remain underexplored. Objective: To determine optimal timing for assessing sGFAP and sNfL, establish cutoff values differentiating between attacks and remissions in NMOSD, and evaluate these findings across independent cohorts. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, longitudinal, multicenter cohort study was conducted among patients with aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-IgG)-positive NMOSD. Patients with available stored serum samples were included, totaling 181 patients with 625 samples. Discovery cohort samples were collected from February 2008 to October 2023 and validation cohort samples were collected from January 2013 to October 2023. A combined analysis of both cohorts was conducted from November 2023 to March 2024. Exposures: sNfL and sGFAP concentrations, measured by a single-molecule array assay. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the optimal timing of assessing sGFAP and sNfL and the adjusted cutoff values for evaluating disease activity in NMOSD. Results: The discovery cohort consisted of 366 samples from 78 Korean patients (median [IQR] age, 35 [30-42] years; 73 female patients [95%]), while the validation cohort included 190 samples from 34 German patients (median [IQR] age, 54 [39-61] years; 32 female patients [94%]) and 69 samples from 69 Brazilian patients (median [IQR] age, 46 [35-55] years; 62 female patients [90%]). Six-month postattack temporal biomarker dynamics were analyzed in 202 samples from 74 patients in the discovery cohort: sGFAP levels peaked within the first week and sNfL levels peaked at 5 weeks postattack. The optimal time frames for evaluating attacks were within 1 week for sGFAP and from 1 to 8 weeks for sNfL, with remission defined as at least 6 months postattack. z Score cutoffs of 3.0 for sGFAP and 2.1 for sNfL effectively distinguished between attack and remission phases, indicated by area under the curve values of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.88-1.02) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91), respectively. The discovery cohort time frames and cutoff values were applied to the validation cohort, achieving 71% sensitivity and 94% specificity for sNfL and 100% sensitivity and specificity for sGFAP in the German and Brazilian cohorts. Conclusions and Relevance: This longitudinal cohort study established optimal timing and thresholds for sGFAP and sNfL, which were consistent in independent cohorts, supporting these biomarkers' effectiveness in distinguishing NMOSD attacks from remission.

Indexed as

Aquaporin 4AutoantibodiesGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinImmunoglobulin GNeurofilament ProteinsNeuromyelitis OpticaAdultBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAQP4 protein, humanAquaporin 4AutoantibodiesBiomarkersGFAP protein, humanGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinImmunoglobulin Gneurofilament protein LNeurofilament Proteins

Identifiers

PMID39714824
PMCPMC11811799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.