Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39714798›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2025

Variation in Emergency Department Physician Admitting Practices and Subsequent Mortality.

Stephen Coussens, Dan P Ly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Marginal Dispositions and Shared Decision-Making Among Older Adults in the ED: A Prospective Cohort Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephen CoussensDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Dan P LyDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: An emergency department (ED) physician's decision to admit a patient to the hospital plays a pivotal role in determining the type and intensity of care that patient will receive. ED physicians vary widely in their propensity to admit patients to the hospital, but it is unknown whether higher admission propensities result in lower subsequent mortality rates. Objective: To measure the variation in ED physicians' admission propensities and estimate their association with patients' subsequent mortality rates. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used nationwide Veterans Affairs electronic health record data from January 2011 to December 2019, comparing physicians practicing within the same ED. The study population was composed of patients visiting the ED with 1 of the 3 most frequent chief complaints in US EDs (chest pain, shortness of breath, and abdominal pain). The data analyses were performed from May 2022 to October 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were variation in physicians' adjusted admission rates, short inpatient stays (<24 hours), and 30-day mortality. Results: The study population included 2098 physicians seeing 2 137 681 patient visits across 105 EDs. The mean (SD) patient age was 63 (15) years, and 9.8% of patients were female. The mean admission rate was 41.2%, and the mean 30-day mortality rate was 2.5%. Physicians' adjusted admission rates varied greatly within the same ED (eg, for chest pain: 90th percentile of physicians, 56.6% admitted vs 10th percentile, 32.6% admitted; difference, 24.0 percentage points), despite finding no association between these adjusted admission rates and patients' prior health status as measured by their Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score before the ED visit. However, patients admitted by physicians with higher admission rates were more likely to be discharged within 24 hours (eg, 31.0% vs 24.8%, respectively), while patients of physicians with higher admission rates had subsequent mortality rates that were no less than those of patients of physicians with lower admission rates. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study demonstrated that ED physicians vary widely in their admission propensity, despite seeing patients with similar prior health status. The results suggest that patients treated by physicians with higher admission propensities are more likely to be discharged after only a short inpatient stay and experience no reduction in subsequent mortality rates.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHospital MortalityPatient AdmissionPractice Patterns, Physicians'AgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39714798
PMCPMC11791704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.