Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39714783›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2024

Prevalence, Distribution and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae and Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated From Environmental Samples in a Veterinary Clinical Hospital in Madrid, Spain.

Jesús Antonio Pérez Jiménez, Silvia Penelo Hidalgo, María-Rosario Baquero Artigao, Gustavo Ortiz-Díez, Tania Ayllón Santiago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jesús Antonio Pérez JiménezFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Madrid, Spain.
Silvia Penelo HidalgoServicio de Urgencias, Hospitalización y UCI, Hospital Clínico Veterinario Complutense, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9199-7341
María-Rosario Baquero ArtigaoFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8825-1696
Gustavo Ortiz-DíezHospital Clínico Veterinario Complutense, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8242-2658
Tania Ayllón SantiagoFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1195-5078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli is a major public health concern, particularly in hospitals where surfaces can act as reservoirs for resistant microorganisms. Identifying these bacteria in hospital environments is crucial for improving healthcare safety. This study aimed to analyse environmental samples from a veterinary hospital to identify prevalent microorganisms and detect antimicrobial resistance patterns. A total of 183 surface samples were collected from 26 areas at the Veterinary Clinical Hospital of Alfonso X el Sabio University in Madrid. The isolated strains were identified, and susceptibility profiles were determined via the disk diffusion method. Clonality analysis was performed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. In total, 109 strains were isolated: 76.15% from the Enterobacteriaceae family and 23.85% non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli. The isolates included Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Escherichia and Pseudomonas species, which could include high-risk clones, given their ability to carry several antimicrobial resistance genes. The equine area had the highest number of isolates (n = 71), accounting for 65% of the total. High resistance indices were observed against at least five of the 16 antibiotics tested, indicating significant multidrug resistance. Clonality analysis suggested potential cross-transmission within the facility. This study sampled hospital surfaces but not personnel or animals, making contamination sources unclear. Without resampling, the effectiveness of cleaning protocols remains uncertain. Results suggest that hospital staff play a key role in bacterial transmission. The lack of specialised preventive measures in veterinary hospitals highlights a need for further research and improvement.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsEnterobacteriaceaeHospitals, AnimalMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnimalsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldEnvironmental MicrobiologyGram-Negative BacteriaPrevalenceSpainAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial resistanceEnterobacteriaceaenon‐fermenting gram‐negative bacillinosocomial infectionsveterinary hospital

Identifiers

PMID39714783
PMCPMC11665279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.