Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39714748›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2024

Reduced-port laparoscopic right colonic resection with D3 lymph node dissection and transvaginal specimen extraction (NOSES VIIIa) for right colon cancer: clinical features.

S K Efetov, Y Cao, P D Panova, D I Khlusov, A M Shulutko

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Can We Reduce Ports While Preserving Outcomes? A Case Series of 3-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with Intracorporeal Anastomosis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S K EfetovDepartment of Faculty Surgery No. 2, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia. efetov@mail.ru.
Y CaoDepartment of Faculty Surgery No. 2, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
P D PanovaDepartment of Faculty Surgery No. 2, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
D I KhlusovDepartment of Faculty Surgery No. 2, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
A M ShulutkoDepartment of Faculty Surgery No. 2, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReduced-port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) uses the minimum possible number of ports or small-sized ports in laparoscopic surgery. The combination of RPLS and natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) minimizes the procedural damage.

methodsA total of 17 patients diagnosed with right colon cancer were included: 5 patients in the RPLS + NOSE group and 12 patients in the conventional laparoscopic surgery (CL) + mini-laparotomy (ML) group. We highlight the key steps of the RPLS + NOSE procedure and compare the clinicopathological characteristics and short-term postoperative outcomes of the two groups.

resultsCompared to CL + ML, RPLS + NOSE was associated with short hospitalization (8.80 ± 1.30 vs 13.75 ± 2.63, p = 0.001), faster first flatus (1.80 ± 0.45 vs 3.4 ± 0.90, p = 0.020) and less postoperative pain on the first day (2.40 ± 0.55 vs 4.25 ± 1.60, p = 0.025). Regarding operation time, intraoperative bleeding, tumor size, proximal and distal margin, number of lymph nodes harvested, number of positive lymph nodes, R0 resection, bowel movements, postoperative complications, Clavien-Dindo classification, Benz's classification and postoperative pain on day 1, day 3 and day 5, no significant difference was observed.

conclusionIn selected patients, RPLS with D3 lymph node dissection and transvaginal specimen extraction results in fast recovery and is indicated for colon cancer patients.

Indexed as

ColectomyColonic NeoplasmsLaparoscopyLymph Node ExcisionNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryVaginaAgedColon, AscendingFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative PainRetrospective StudiesColon cancerColon surgeryD3 lymph node dissectionNOSESReduced-port laparoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39714748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.