ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
The intricate "ART" of ICSI.
Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic, environmental, and sex-specific programming of long-term health in Assisted Reproductive Technologies-conceived offspring†.Biology of reproduction · 2026Review
- High-resolution mapping of embryonic genome activation unveils a decoupling of transcription activation from precocious H3K4me3 removal.Science advances · 2026Article
- Assisted oocyte activation re-envisioned: a more physiological approach.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Eye tracking reveals expert gaze patterns during intracytoplasmic sperm injection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Innovations in assisted reproductive technologies: evaluating efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes in female infertility.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2026Review
- Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Ray of Hope for Infertility.ACS omega · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This manuscript explores the intricacies and nuances of the Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) procedure, drawing on insights from three decades of experience at a specialized center managing numerous cases of male factor infertility. Our center is comprised of an embryology laboratory, an andrology and assisted fertilization laboratory, and a Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) laboratory, each fostering specialized expertise independently. Collaboration among these laboratories, alongside reproductive physicians and urologists, ensures comprehensive feedback and optimal care for patients undergoing infertility treatment. The manuscript specifically focuses on the andrology laboratory's pivotal role in evaluating and treating infertile patients, highlighting critical preparations for the ICSI procedure, and the key considerations essential to its successful implementation, including the selection of the ideal spermatozoon, oocyte dysmaturity, proper equipment, and most importantly the execution of the procedure itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.