ReviewIntensive care medicine2025
Management of adult sepsis in resource-limited settings: global expert consensus statements using a Delphi method.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vasopressor Use Among Adults With Sepsis in Uganda and Rwanda: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- From the Oracle of Delphi to Intensive Care Unit Guidelines: Consensus Building Using the Delphi Method.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Pulse pressure versus continuous flow monitoring for fluid responsiveness prediction during passive leg raising: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- The Same Instrument, Differently Tuned? Surveys, Delphi Studies, and the Search for Structured Disagreement.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Predictors of ICU mortality in septic patients in a resource-limited African setting: a prospective multicenter cohort study in Lubumbashi, DRC.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Removal of activated neutrophils by a polymyxin B-immobilized fiber (PMX) column.The International journal of artificial organs · 2026Article
- Access to haemodynamic evaluation tools in middle-income countries: a survey of 1593 anaesthetists and intensivists from 39 nations.BJA open · 2026Article
- Clarithromycin for treating sepsis in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Aminotransferase-to-platelet Ratio Index for Sepsis-associated Liver Dysfunction: Promising Triage Signal but Phenotype Confounding and Implementation Calibration must be Intensive Care Unit Ready.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Epidemiology, Management, and Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Infection in a Resource-Limited Setting in Southeast Asia: A Prospective Observational Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Using the 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines in Practice.Critical care science · 2026Article
- SOFA-2 represents meaningful progress toward a more inclusive and equitable global sepsis assessment framework.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Current standard of care for septic shock.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- ESICM 2025 haemodynamic recommendations: a remarkable achievement and raising questions.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Peripheral perfusion-guided versus routine fluid therapy in sepsis: A randomized controlled pilot trial.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2026Article
- Integrated multi-omics of mitophagy-related molecular subtype characterization and biomarker identification in sepsis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Expert consensus for difficult airway management in the absence of clear evidence using a Delphi method.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Identification of transcriptomic sepsis endotypes in sub-Saharan Africa: derivation, validation, and global alignment in two Ugandan cohorts.Intensive care medicine · 2025Observational
- Evaluation of clinical research priorities in Asian intensive care units (ERA-ICU).Journal of intensive care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
51 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo generate consensus and provide expert clinical practice statements for the management of adult sepsis in resource-limited settings.
methodsAn international multidisciplinary Steering Committee with expertise in sepsis management and including a Delphi methodologist was convened by the Asia Pacific Sepsis Alliance (APSA). The committee selected an international panel of clinicians and researchers with expertise in sepsis management. A Delphi process based on an iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus statements.
resultsA stable consensus was achieved for 30 (94%) of the statements by 41 experts after four survey rounds. These include consensus on managing patients with sepsis outside a designated critical care area, triggers for escalating clinical management and criteria for safe transfer to another facility. The experts agreed on the following: in the absence of serum lactate, clinical parameters such as altered mental status, capillary refill time and urine output may be used to guide resuscitation; special considerations regarding the volume of fluid used for resuscitation, especially in tropical infections, including the use of simple tests to assess fluid responsiveness when facilities for advanced hemodynamic monitoring are limited; use of Ringer's lactate or Hartmann's solution as balanced salt solutions; epinephrine when norepinephrine or vasopressin are unavailable; and the administration of vasopressors via a peripheral vein if central venous access is unavailable or not feasible. Similarly, where facilities for investigation are unavailable, there was consensus for empirical antimicrobial administration without delay when sepsis was strongly suspected, as was the empirical use of antiparasitic agents in patients with suspicion of parasitic infections.
conclusionUsing a Delphi method, international experts reached consensus to generate expert clinical practice statements providing guidance to clinicians worldwide on the management of sepsis in resource-limited settings. These statements complement existing guidelines where evidence is lacking and add relevant aspects of sepsis management that are not addressed by current international guidelines. Future studies are needed to assess the effects of these practice statements and address remaining uncertainties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.