ArticleMolecular diversity2025
A 4D tensor-enhanced multi-dimensional convolutional neural network for accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid Dual-Context Prompted Cross-Attention Framework with Language Model Guidance for Multi-Label Prediction of Human Off-Target Ligand-Protein Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Deciphering the anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory activity in natural bioactive compounds of Typhonium flagelliforme: in silico approaches with special target to NEK7.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Article
- Design, synthesis, bioactivity and action mechanism of N-substituted N'-phenylpicolinohydrazides against phytopathogenic fungi.Molecular diversity · 2025Article
- Interface-driven structural evolution on diltiazem as novel uPAR inhibitors: from in silico design to in vitro evaluation.Molecular diversity · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-ligand interactions are the molecular basis of many important cellular activities, such as gene regulation, cell metabolism, and signal transduction. Protein-ligand binding affinity is a crucial metric of the strength of the interaction between the two, and accurate prediction of its binding affinity is essential for discovering drugs' new uses. So far, although many predictive models based on machine learning and deep learning have been reported, most of the models mainly focus on one-dimensional sequence and two-dimensional structural characteristics of proteins and ligands, but fail to deeply explore the detailed interaction information between proteins and ligand atoms in the binding pocket region of three-dimensional space. In this study, we introduced a novel 4D tensor feature to capture key interactions within the binding pocket and developed a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) model based on this feature. Using ten-fold cross-validation, we identified the optimal parameter combination and pocket size. Additionally, we employed feature engineering to extract features across multiple dimensions, including one-dimensional sequences, two-dimensional structures of the ligand and protein, and three-dimensional interaction features between them. We proposed an efficient protein-ligand binding affinity prediction model MCDTA (multi-dimensional convolutional drug-target affinity), built on a multi-dimensional convolutional neural network framework. Feature ablation experiments revealed that the 4D tensor feature had the most significant impact on model performance. MCDTA performed exceptionally well on the PDBbind v.2020 dataset, achieving an RMSE of 1.231 and a PCC of 0.823. In comparative experiments, it outperformed five other mainstream binding affinity prediction models, with an RMSE of 1.349 and a PCC of 0.795. Moreover, MCDTA demonstrated strong generalization ability and practical screening performance across multiple benchmark datasets, highlighting its reliability and accuracy in predicting protein-ligand binding affinity. The code for MCDTA is available at https://github.com/dfhuang-AI/MCDTA .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39714563What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.