ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025
Another way? An investigation into an institution's use of the Wayson stain in re-evaluating "no organisms seen" on Gram stain smears from positive blood cultures.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Identifying Anaerobic Pathogens in a Pediatric Brain Abscess Secondary to Sinusitis: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Novel rapid diagnostic system for pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing: clinical utility in ICU patients with sepsis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated continuous monitoring blood culture instruments identify metabolism byproducts and flag blood culture bottles as "positive." A Gram stain is used to visualize and characterize the microbial growth in the broth and initiate additional testing. When no organisms are seen (NOS) on Gram stain, in our laboratory, bottles are reevaluated with a Wayson stain, a rapid one-step stain that provides contrast between organisms and the background, especially in Gram-negative organisms. In this study, we assess the performance of the Wayson stain on reevaluation of Gram stain NOS blood culture bottles. The study period, August 2022 to July 2023, includes blood cultures that were flagged as positive by the automated blood culture instrument (BACTEC) with accompanying Gram and Wayson stain interpretations and organism identification. 133,463 blood cultures were performed during the study period, and 20,129 cultures were flagged as positive by BACTEC. 601 NOS Gram stain cultures were identified of which 76 had a positive Wayson. The Wayson stain procedure increased the sensitivity of direct organism visualization from 99.32% to 99.71% by identifying 55% (76 of 137) of NOS Gram stain blood culture bottles. Of blood cultures that were positive by BACTEC with NOS Gram and Wayson stains (475), 414 were finalized as no growth and 61 had an isolate (false negatives) of which 49% (30) were yeasts. The Wayson stain aided in detecting gram-negative genera such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.