Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39713859›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2025

Using Self-Reported Training Characteristics to Better Understand Who Is More Likely to Sustain Running-Related Injuries Than Others: The Garmin-RUNSAFE Running Health Study.

Josefin Abrahamson, Ida Lindman, Mathilde Birksoe Eriksen, Albert Kibsgaard, Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Predicting self-reported injury status among runners training for the New York City Marathon.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026
    Observational
  2. Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Injuries Associated with Marathon Running.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Josefin AbrahamsonOrthopaedic Research Unit, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ida LindmanGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mathilde Birksoe EriksenDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Albert KibsgaardDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Rasmus Oestergaard NielsenDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Running is a popular form of physical activity, yet it comes with risks, including running-related injuries (RRIs). This cohort study aimed to use self-reported baseline data on running experience, weekly running frequency, greatest running distance in 1 week, and running program to investigate if certain adult runners were more likely to sustain RRI than others. Runners, aged ≥ 18 years, familiar with the English language and using a Garmin watch to track their running were included. Running data and injury status were collected prospectively through the Garmin Connect application and weekly questionnaires over 18 months. Exposure variables were self-reported running experience (years), weekly running frequency and distance, and use of structured running program (last 3 months before inclusion). The outcome was RRI. Time to event statistics was used to calculate cumulative risk differences (cRD) within groups of each exposure. Data were analyzed at 1000 km (km). A total of 7391 runners were included. The cumulative injury proportion was 57.8% [95% CI: 56.4%; 59.2%] after 1000 km. Those running > 105 km (cRD = -31.6, 95% CI -23.1; -40.1), 7 times per week (cRD = -47.1, 95% CI -35.9; -58.3) and followed a structured running program (cRD = 4.4; 95% CI 0.9; 7.8) had the fewest new RRIs. For running experience, those with few (< 1 years) or many years (> 40 years) of experience had the most RRIs. Runners were more prone to sustain an RRI if they had few (< 1) or many (> 40) years of running experience, lower total weekly running frequency (< 2 times/week), shorter weekly running distance (< 25 km), or did not use a structured running program.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesRunningSelf ReportAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Conditioning, HumanProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultinjuriesrunningrunning‐related injurytraining characteristics

Identifiers

PMID39713859
PMCPMC11664494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.