Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39713807›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2024

An

Aidos Doskaliyev, Vyacheslav Ogay, Islambek Mussabekov, Muratbek Satov, Berik Zhetpisbayev, Khalit Mustafin, Xeniya Bobrova, Raushan Auezova, Serik Akshulakov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aidos DoskaliyevDepartment of Science and Strategy, National Center for Neurosurgery, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Vyacheslav OgayStem Cell Laboratory, National Center for Biotechnology, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Islambek MussabekovDepartment of Education, National Center for Neurosurgery, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Muratbek SatovDepartment of Education, National Center for Neurosurgery, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Berik ZhetpisbayevDepartment of Pathological Anatomy, National Center for Neurosurgery, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Khalit MustafinDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurology, National Center for Neurosurgery, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Xeniya BobrovaDepartment of Research Management, National Center for Neurosurgery, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Raushan AuezovaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurology, National Center for Neurosurgery, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Serik AkshulakovNational Center for Neurosurgery, Astana, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The reconstruction of dura matter is a challenging problem for neurosurgeons. A number of materials for dural reconstruction have recently been developed, but some of them have poor biocompatibility, poor mechanical properties, and adverse effects. Bovine parietal peritoneum is a promising natural material for regenerative medicine and reconstructive surgery. In this study, we conducted an Methods: The dural defects in mature New Zealand rabbits were studied. A BPM was sutured on the dural defect area of each animal. Autologous periosteum and collagen membranes (Lyoplant®) were used to facilitate a comparison with the BPMs. ELISA, histomorphological analysis, and hematological analysis were carried out to examine the safety and efficacy of using BPMs as dural substitutes. Results: Our results showed that the BPMs demonstrated a deterioration rate that is suitable for gathering newly formed meningothelial tissue. The thickness and density of BPM fibers prevents resorption in the first few days after use as a plastic material, and the regeneration of the dura mater does not occur at an accelerated pace, meaning that the gradual formation of fibrous tissue prevents adhesion to the brain surface. It was observed that the BPM can integrate with the adjacent tissue to repair dural defects. Moreover, the transplantation of BPMs did not cause significant adverse effects or immunological responses, indicating the safety and good biocompatibility of the BPM. Conclusion: Thus, our

Indexed as

bovine parietal peritoneumdural substitutedura matterduraplastyregeneration

Identifiers

PMID39713807
PMCPMC11659263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.