ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
What is Known About Early Mobilisation After Cardiac Electronic Device Implant? A Scoping Review.
Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The number of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) implanted has been growing and the population who receive the device is older and has more comorbidities. Long bed rest and immobilisation have always been common after the implant, but a consensus does not exist on the argument. Purpose: To map and synthesise available literature on the mobilisation approach after the implant of a CIED and which correlated outcomes exist. Methods: A literature search was conducted in December 2023 on six databases. Screening of articles, data extraction and quality appraisal were performed by more than one author. Articles included were primary articles exploring bed rest or mobilisation after a CIED procedure. Descriptive analysis was conducted to present and synthesise the results. Results: Of the 113 records identified, eight matched the inclusion criteria. The majority of the articles were randomised controlled trials (n = 6). Other studies were quasi-experimental (n = 1), retrospective (n = 1) and cross-sectional (n = 1). Data descriptive analysis led to the development of three main topics: (1) mobilisation modalities, (2) potential complications and (3) type of device. Conclusions: Early mobilisation after a CIED procedure appears to be safe and not associated with other complications. A predominant barrier to early mobilisation is the lack of a consensus on the time and type of mobilisation. Early mobilisation could be applied more safely with the use of an arm support. To strengthen the evidence there is a need for more rigorous research analysing the type of device and the leads utilised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.