Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39713774›Full record

ArticleSarcoma2024

Oral Etoposide for Relapsed or Refractory Ewing Sarcoma in Adolescent and Adult Patients.

Louise Kostos, Victoria Rayson, Jayesh Desai, Lisa Orme, Susie Bae, Anne Hamilton, Stephen J Luen, Jeremy Lewin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sarcoma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Louise KostosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6072-5175
Victoria RaysonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jayesh DesaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lisa OrmeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Susie BaeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4514-4142
Anne HamiltonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Stephen J LuenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jeremy LewinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4305-117X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prognosis remains poor for patients with relapsed or refractory Ewing sarcoma, with limited treatment options after first-line therapy. Oral etoposide has efficacy in the paediatric setting; however, data are limited in adults. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 33 patients with relapsed or refractory Ewing sarcoma who completed at least one cycle of oral etoposide at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre from 2005 to 2020. The median age at diagnosis and first relapse was 21 and 23 years, respectively. All patients had prior exposure to intravenous etoposide. Nine patients (27%) had stable disease for at least 6 months, and six patients (18%) had a partial response. The clinical benefit rate was 45%. The median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI: 1.7-5.5), and OS was 8.5 months (95% CI: 4.1-13.0). Despite prior exposure, oral etoposide demonstrated antitumour activity and durable responses in the relapsed or refractory setting for adult patients with Ewing sarcoma.

Indexed as

etoposideEwing sarcomametronomic chemotherapyrelapsetopoisomerase II inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39713774
PMCPMC11661866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.