Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39713738›Full record

ReviewBiomicrofluidics2024

Recent developments in microfluidic passive separation to enable purification of platelets for transfusion.

Mai T P Dinh, Mubasher Iqbal, Kumar Abhishek, Fong W Lam, Sergey S Shevkoplyas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomicrofluidics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mai T P DinhDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2876-9984
Mubasher IqbalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7466-0067
Kumar AbhishekDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3921-5749
Fong W LamDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2034-2625
Sergey S ShevkoplyasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-8365

Funding

Enabling pediatric leukapheresis with high-throughput microfluidic technologyR01HL151858 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI SHEVKOPLYAS, SERGEY S · 2020 to 2023
$1.6M
Centrifugation-free washing and volume-reduction of platelet concentrate units using high-throughput microfluidic technologyR21HL150154 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI SHEVKOPLYAS, SERGEY S · 2020 to 2021
$421k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151858NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL150154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Platelet transfusion is a lifesaving therapy intended to prevent and treat bleeding. However, in addition to platelets, a typical unit also contains a large volume of supernatant that accumulates multiple pro-inflammatory contaminants, including residual leukocytes, microaggregates, microparticles, antibodies, and cytokines. Infusion of this supernatant is responsible for virtually all adverse reactions to platelet transfusions. Conventional methods for removing residual leukocytes (leukoreduction) and reducing the volume of transfused supernatant (volume reduction) struggle to mitigate these risks holistically. Leukoreduction filters can remove leukocytes and microaggregates but fail to reduce supernatant volume, whereas centrifugation can reduce volume, but it is ineffective against larger contaminants and damages platelets. Additionally, platelet purification based on these methods is often too logistically complex, time-consuming, and labor-intensive to implement routinely. Emerging microfluidic technologies offer promising alternatives through passive separation mechanisms that enable cell separation with minimal damage and drastically reduced instrumentation size and facility requirements. This review examines recent innovations in microfluidic cell separation that can be used for leukoreduction and volume reduction of platelets. It begins by defining the performance requirements that any separation method must meet to successfully replace conventional methods currently used to perform these tasks. Standard performance metrics are described, including leukocyte depletion efficiency, degree of volume reduction, processing throughput, and platelet recovery. Finally, the review outlines the primary challenges that must be overcome to enable simple-to-use, disposable microfluidic devices capable of both reducing the platelet unit volume and removing pro-inflammatory contaminants, while preserving most functional platelets for transfusion.

Identifiers

PMID39713738
PMCPMC11658822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.