ArticleACS omega2024
Correlation Analysis of Ecosystem Reduction and Retention Effects and Spatial Distribution of Soil Potential Toxicity Elements.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soil contamination by potentially toxic elements (PTEs) poses a significant threat to crop quality and human health, making it a global concern. However, the distribution patterns of PTEs across different land-use types are not well understood. To investigate the relationship between the reduction and retention effects of various ecosystem types on soil PTEs, we analyzed five categories of target elements in 299 soil samples from the southeastern Yunnan Province. Using the intelligent urban ecosystem management system's surface source control (runoff) model, descriptive statistical methods, spatial interpolation analyses, and GIS, we simulated the effects of different ecosystem types on soil heavy metals. This approach allowed us to examine the spatial correlations among ecosystem reduction, retention, and PTE distribution in soils. Our results indicate that soil PTE concentrations were indicative of a high-background value area, with concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc exceeding risk screening values. The coefficients of variation for arsenic, cadmium, and lead were extremely high and attributable to high external anthropogenic interference. Soil heavy metal reduction and spatial distribution were affected by the ecosystem's control function, and different ecosystems had different reduction effects. The reduction simulations for As and Pb were concentrated in building areas, while those for Cd and Zn were primarily focused on water bodies. The reduction simulations for Cu were concentrated in the forested areas. In conclusion, ecosystem reduction and retention influence heavy metal distribution, which is essential when planning green ecological development and construction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.