ArticleACS omega2024
Tunneling Times in an Asymmetric Harmonic Double-Well with Application to Electron Transfers in Biological Macromolecules.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tunneling times were calculated in electron transfer processes using an asymmetric harmonic double-well model. The simplicity of a direct variational calculation in the approximate solution of the Schrödinger equation, along with the interpretation of tunneling times within the probabilistic framework of a two-level system, allows for the efficient and accurate determination of tunneling times with minimal computational cost. These calculations were applied to electron transfer processes in the study of the photosynthetic reaction center and in the context of catalysis in UV-induced DNA lesion repair and are in agreement with the experimental, computational, and theoretical results with which they were compared. It was seen that the donor-acceptor distance needed to be adjusted for closer agreement between the calculated and experimentally observed times. However, the adjusted values for this distance remain close to those reported in the literature.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.