ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2022
Strategies for low-molecular-weight heparin management in pregnant women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves: A nationwide survey of Dutch practice.
Review in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thromboprophylaxis and adult congenital heart disease: The latest on indications, risk scoring and therapy.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this study we investigated current Dutch practice of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) treatment in pregnant women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves (MPHV) in order to evaluate how management can be optimized. Methods: Between December 2020 and February 2021, we conducted a survey among Dutch congenital cardiologists of tertiary centers in the Netherlands. We collected and analyzed written, unstructured, open questionnaires that were send to all 8 specialized pregnancy heart teams. Results: Response was obtained from all centers (response rate 100%). The preferred LMWHs were nadroparin (62.5%), dalteparin (25%), and enoxaparin (12.5%). After replacing vitamin K antagonist (VKA) with LMWH, 7 centers measured the first anti-Xa level within a week, and 1 center measured anti-Xa levels daily until targeted levels were reached. All centers monitored weekly peak anti-Xa levels (4-6 h post-dose) throughout pregnancy. Four out of 8 centers monitored additional trough (i.e. pre-dose) anti-Xa levels, and 3 of these 4 centers switched to LMWH 3 times daily to achieve target levels when necessary. Conclusions: In Dutch clinical practice, a considerable variation exists in LMWH management for pregnant women with MPHV. In some centers, LMWH was dosed 3 times daily to maintain target anti-Xa levels. Standardizing treatment strategies would allow systematic assessment in prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.