Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39713552›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2022

Strategies for low-molecular-weight heparin management in pregnant women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves: A nationwide survey of Dutch practice.

Marco Voortman, Jolien W Roos, Jennichjen Slomp, Arie P J van Dijk, Berto J Bouma, Gertjan T J Sieswerda, Philippine Kiès, Anna Boer, Willem M Waskowsky, Clemens von Birgelen and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marco VoortmanDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Jolien W RoosDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jennichjen SlompDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Medlon, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Arie P J van DijkDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Berto J BoumaHeart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gertjan T J SieswerdaDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Philippine KièsDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Anna BoerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Willem M WaskowskyDepartment of Cardiology, Isala Heart Centre, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Clemens von BirgelenDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Lodewijk J WagenaarDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In this study we investigated current Dutch practice of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) treatment in pregnant women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves (MPHV) in order to evaluate how management can be optimized. Methods: Between December 2020 and February 2021, we conducted a survey among Dutch congenital cardiologists of tertiary centers in the Netherlands. We collected and analyzed written, unstructured, open questionnaires that were send to all 8 specialized pregnancy heart teams. Results: Response was obtained from all centers (response rate 100%). The preferred LMWHs were nadroparin (62.5%), dalteparin (25%), and enoxaparin (12.5%). After replacing vitamin K antagonist (VKA) with LMWH, 7 centers measured the first anti-Xa level within a week, and 1 center measured anti-Xa levels daily until targeted levels were reached. All centers monitored weekly peak anti-Xa levels (4-6 h post-dose) throughout pregnancy. Four out of 8 centers monitored additional trough (i.e. pre-dose) anti-Xa levels, and 3 of these 4 centers switched to LMWH 3 times daily to achieve target levels when necessary. Conclusions: In Dutch clinical practice, a considerable variation exists in LMWH management for pregnant women with MPHV. In some centers, LMWH was dosed 3 times daily to maintain target anti-Xa levels. Standardizing treatment strategies would allow systematic assessment in prospective studies.

Indexed as

AnticoagulationMechanical heart valvePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39713552
PMCPMC11657485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.