ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2022
Atrial arrhythmias in patients beyond 40 Years of age post atrial septal defect device closure.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients >40 years with an atrial septal defect (ASD) may have atrial arrhythmia which warrants treatment. It is unclear whether preventive left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion should be performed simultaneously during ASD closure in these patients. Objective: This study aimed to examine the incidence of de novo atrial arrhythmia in patients >40 years old post transcatheter closure of ASD. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study involving all consecutive patients who have undergone device closure of ASDs at age >40 years. Standard 12-lead ECGs were performed pre-procedure and during every clinic follow-up. Ambulatory monitors were applied when indicated. Results: Eighty-eight patients (mean age: 51.81 ± 8.01 years; male: 22.7%) were recruited and followed up over a median duration of 3.6 years (range: 1-6.5). Seven patients (8%) had documented atrial arrhythmia (AA) pre and post ASD closure. Two patients (2.5%) developed de novo atrial fibrillation and one patient (1.2%), ectopic atrial rhythm during follow-up. In univariate analyses, age >61.3 years (p < 0.001), a history of palpitation (p = 0.006), right atrial area >25.15cm2 pre-closure (p = 0.004); dilated right and left atrium immediately post ASD closure (p = 0.016 & 0.001) and pulmonary vascular resistance >1.31Woods unit (p = 0.036) were associated with increased risk of AA. However, on multivariate analyses, none were significantly associated with AA. Conclusions: De novo atrial arrhythmia after ASD device closure is uncommon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.