ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2024
Comparison in the adult congenital heart disease severity classification of ACC/AHA and ESC guidelines in a 3,459 Mexican population.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation for Ebstein's Anomaly: A Viable Treatment Option in Latin America.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Dyadic Mental Health in Paediatric Congenital Heart Disease: Actor-Partner Associations Between Child HRQoL/Depression and Caregiver Stress Across Lesion Severity.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The lethal fifth cardiac chamber: a rare autopsy case report of left atrial appendage aneurysm and review of literature.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Review
- Review
- The Ottoman empire sword: a variant of partial anomalous pulmonary veins connections.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Latin American registries of clinical and demographic profiles of ACHD are scarce. International guidelines classify disease complexity with different approaches. With these two regards, a registry was carried out to examine factors associated with mortality and to compare severity classifications in our population. Methods and results: Cross-sectional study conducted on ACHD between 2018 and 2022 to evaluate clinical and demographic characteristics and to assess the agreement between the 2020 ESC Guidelines and 2018 AHA/ACC Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease using the Conclusion: This study found that ESC and AHA/ACC complexity classifications have limited concordance in categorizing moderate complexity CHD. Reparative procedures had lower mortality odds than palliative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.