Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39713278›Full record

ArticleClinical optometry2024

Real-Time Changes in the Comfort of a Toric, Monthly, Soft Contact Lens Over a Long Day of Wear.

Chris Lievens, Amy Perkins, Elyse Rayborn, Yueren Wang, Quentin Franklin, Kristopher May, Shane Kannarr, Morgan Bromley, Andrew D Pucker

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical optometry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06052046 (How Does Total30 for Astigmatism Perform During a Long Day of Wear?), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06052046 nacompletednot on this map

How Does Total30 for Astigmatism Perform During a Long Day of Wear?

TypeinterventionalSponsorSouthern College of OptometryRan2023 to 2024Enrolled48ConditionsContact Lens Complication, Astigmatism, Refractive ErrorsArmsTOTAL30 for Astigmatism Contact Lenses
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chris LievensSouthern College of Optometry, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4208-6175
Amy PerkinsSouthern College of Optometry, Memphis, TN, USA.
Elyse RaybornSouthern College of Optometry, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0927-6073
Yueren WangSouthern College of Optometry, Memphis, TN, USA.
Quentin FranklinUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Optometry, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Kristopher MayEye Research Associates, Pittsburg, KS, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-3777-5786
Shane KannarrEye Research Associates, Pittsburg, KS, USA.
Morgan BromleySouthern College of Optometry, Memphis, TN, USA.
Andrew D PuckerEminent Ophthalmic Services, LLC, Milledgeville, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this work was to determine the comfort performance of a toric, monthly, silicon hydrogel CL (lehfilcon A; TOTAL30 for Astigmatism) over a long day of wear. Methods: This was a 1-month, 3-visit, prospective, single-arm study. Adult, 18- to 45-year-old CL wearers with good vision who were minimally symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 scores ≤12) were enrolled. Subjects were required to have astigmatism ranging from -0.75 D to -2.50 D in each eye and were required to wear the study CLs from about 8:00 AM until 12:00 AM each day. Comfort data with the study CL throughout the wear day were collected via text messaging. Results: A total of 47 subjects who had a mean ± SD age of 29.5 ± 7.0 years were analyzed. Within a specified time point across the month of wear, CL comfort did not vary (all p-value ≥ 0.82), yet CL comfort did decrease across the wear day for all days evaluated (all p-value <0.001). Most subjects found their CLs to be comfortable with only 1.8% of subjects reporting an uncomfortable score at CL application and only 8.5% of subjects reporting an uncomfortable score after 16 hours of CL wear. Conclusion: A high level of consistency and predictability in comfort was found within the first month of wearing lehfilcon A CLs. This suggests that patients with minimal CL-related discomfort at initial fitting of a lehfilcon A CL may likely tolerate longer wear time with minimal discomfort across the entire month of wear. Clinical Trialsgov Id: NCT06052046.

Indexed as

comfortcontact Lenseslehfilcon Atoricvisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID39713278
PMCPMC11662920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.