Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39713237›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2024

Verbal working memory and syntactic comprehension segregate into the dorsal and ventral streams, respectively.

William Matchin, Zeinab K Mollasaraei, Leonardo Bonilha, Christopher Rorden, Gregory Hickok, Dirk den Ouden, Julius Fridriksson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Syntactic processing engages the semantic control network.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

William MatchinDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2530-8429
Zeinab K MollasaraeiDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Leonardo BonilhaDepartment of Pharmacology, Physiology, Neuroscience, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Christopher RordenDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7554-6142
Gregory HickokDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Dirk den OudenDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Julius FridrikssonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

Funding

Telerehab for Aphasia (TERRA)P50DC014664 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BONILHA, LEONARDO F · 2016 to 2025
$25.0M
Cortical and Subcortical Organization of Language-Related Semantic Processing in Alzheimer's DiseaseR01DC014021 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BONILHA, LEONARDO F · 2014 to 2023
$4.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC014664NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Syntactic processing and verbal working memory are both essential components to sentence comprehension. Nonetheless, the separability of these systems in the brain remains unclear. To address this issue, we performed causal-inference analyses based on lesion and connectome network mapping using MRI and behavioural testing in two groups of individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia. We employed a rhyme judgement task with heavy working memory load without articulatory confounds, controlling for the overall ability to match auditory words to pictures and to perform a metalinguistic rhyme judgement, isolating the effect of working memory load (103 individuals). We assessed non-canonical sentence comprehension, isolating syntactic processing by incorporating residual rhyme judgement performance as a covariate for working memory load (78 individuals). Voxel-based lesion analyses and structural connectome-based lesion symptom mapping controlling for total lesion volume were performed, with permutation testing to correct for multiple comparisons (4000 permutations). We observed that effects of working memory load localized to dorsal stream damage: posterior temporal-parietal lesions and frontal-parietal white matter disconnections. These effects were differentiated from syntactic comprehension deficits, which were primarily associated with ventral stream damage: lesions to temporal lobe and temporal-parietal white matter disconnections, particularly when incorporating the residual measure of working memory load as a covariate. Our results support the conclusion that working memory and syntactic processing are associated with distinct brain networks, largely loading onto dorsal and ventral streams, respectively.

Indexed as

aphasialesion-symptom mappingsyntaxtractographyworking memory

Identifiers

PMID39713237
PMCPMC11660927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.