Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39713192›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting2024

Evaluating Active Learning Strategies for Automated Classification of Patient Safety Event Reports in Hospitals.

Shehnaz Islam, Myrtede Alfred, Dulaney Wilson, Eldan Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shehnaz IslamMechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4032-1445
Myrtede AlfredMechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dulaney WilsonPublic Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Eldan CohenMechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5767-6683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient safety event (PSE) reports, which document incidents that compromise patient safety, are fundamental for improving healthcare quality. Accurate classification of these reports is crucial for analyzing trends, guiding interventions, and supporting organizational learning. However, this process is labor-intensive due to the high volume and complex taxonomy of reports. Previous work has shown that machine learning (ML) can automate PSE report classification; however, its success depends on large manually-labeled datasets. This study leverages Active Learning (AL) strategies with human expertise to streamline PSE-report labeling. We utilize pool-based AL sampling to selectively query reports for human annotation, developing a robust dataset for training ML classifiers. Our experiments demonstrate that AL significantly outperforms random sampling in accuracy across various text representations, reducing the need for labeled samples by 24% to 69%. Based on these findings, we suggest that incorporating AL strategies into PSE-report labeling can effectively reduce manual workload while maintaining high classification accuracy.

Indexed as

active learningartificial intelligenceautomationclassificationhealthcarehuman factorsincident reportingmachine learningnatural language processingpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID39713192
PMCPMC11655274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.