Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39713190›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting2024

Calibrating Trust, Reliance and Dependence in Variable-Reliability Automation.

Christopher Holland, Grace Perry, Heather F Neyedli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Influence of Performance Feedback on Trust and Self-Confidence in Dynamically Reliable Automation.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher HollandDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Grace PerryDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Heather F NeyedliDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trust and system reliability can influence a user's dependence on automated systems. This study aimed to investigate how increases and decreases in automation reliability affect users' trust in these systems and how these changes in trust are associated with users' dependence on the system. Participants completed a color identification task with the help of an automated aid, where the reliability of this aid either increased from 50% to 100% or decreased from 100% to 50% as the task progressed, depending on which group the participants were assigned to. Participants' trust, self-confidence, and dependence on the system were measured throughout the experiment. There were no differences in trust between the two groups throughout the experiment; however, participants' dependence behavior did follow system reliability. These findings highlight that trust is not always correlated with system reliability, and that although trust can often influence dependence, it does not always determine it.

Indexed as

automation reliabilitydecision aidhuman–automation interactiontrust calibrationtrust dynamicstrust in automation

Identifiers

PMID39713190
PMCPMC11655268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.