Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39713178›Full record

ReviewAquaculture nutrition2024

A Brief Review on Aflatoxicosis in Aquaculture With a Focus on Fish.

Mina Ziarati, Ahmad Imani, Hamed Ghafarifarsani, Deepa Bhatt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aquaculture nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Janus Face ofVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mina ZiaratiDepartment of Microbiology, National Center for Survey and Disease Diagnosis, Iranian Veterinary Organization (IVO), Bushehr, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9470-0574
Ahmad ImaniDepartment of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0975-9406
Hamed GhafarifarsaniDepartment of Animal Science, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Shahrekord, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1199-6109
Deepa BhattDepartment of Aquaculture, College of Fisheries, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3785-841X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feed quality is among the most determinative criteria for aquaculture success. Along with feed ingredient quality and its production process, feed storage conditions would also affect feed quality, especially in terms of adventitious toxins. Mycotoxins are frequent food and feed contaminants and are considered important health threats to both human and animal health. In this context, the effects of mycotoxins on aquatic animals were reviewed with an emphasis on aflatoxin B

Indexed as

aflatoxicosisaquacultureaquafeedfeed contaminantsfungal toxinsmycotoxins

Identifiers

PMID39713178
PMCPMC11663045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.