Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39713131›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Validation and modification of existing bleeding complications prediction models for percutaneous renal biopsy: a prospective study.

Xing Li, Min Liu, Di-Fei Duan, Yu Yan, Dengyan Ma

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xing Li *Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Min Liu *Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Di-Fei DuanDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yu YanDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Dengyan MaDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bleeding complications following percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) are a significant clinical concern. This study aimed to validate and refine existing prediction models for post-biopsy bleeding to support more accurate clinical decision-making. Methods: Clinical data from 471 PRB patients were examined in this prospective analysis. Ultrasounds were performed immediately and 6 h post-biopsy to identify perinephric hematomas. Patients exhibiting severe pain, a hemoglobin drop of >10 g/L, symptomatic hypotension, hematuria within 7 days post-procedure underwent repeat ultrasound to assess for bleeding complications. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with bleeding risk. The predictive performance of three kidney biopsy risk calculators (KBRC) was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and decision curve analysis (DCA) to determine clinical utility. Nomograms were developed for each model to facilitate clinical application. Results: Univariate analysis identified body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin, and ultrasound findings as significant predictors of bleeding complications. In multivariable analysis, BMI, immediate ultrasound, and 6-h ultrasound data remained significant ( Conclusion: Incorporating real-time ultrasound data post-PRB significantly enhances the predictive accuracy and risk reclassification capability of bleeding risk models. These findings provide critical insights for guiding clinical management decisions in patients undergoing renal biopsy.

Indexed as

KidneyNomogramsAdultAgedBiopsyBody Mass IndexClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHematomaHematuriaHemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative HemorrhageProspective StudiesBleeding complicationsDecision curve analysisIntegrated discrimination improvementNet reclassification improvementNomogramsPercutaneous renal biopsyPrediction modelUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39713131
PMCPMC11663403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.