ArticleInternational journal of women's health2024
Nomogram Model for Predicting Minimal Breast Cancer Based on Clinical and Ultrasonic Characteristics.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a nomogram for differentiating granulomatous lobular mastitis from ductal carcinoma in situ.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To construct a nomogram prediction model on minimal breast cancer (≦ 10 mm) based on clinical and ultrasound parameters. Methods: Clinical and ultrasound data of 433 patients with minimal breast lesions was conducted in this retrospective study. Patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set with a ratio of 7:3. Independent risk factors for minimal breast cancer were selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariable logistic regression analysis to construct a nomogram prediction model. The calibration curve, the clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) and the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the model. Results: Age, margin, shape, and breast density were independent risk factors for malignant minimal breast lesions ( Conclusion: The nomogram prediction model has good discrimination, calibration and clinical practical value in the training set and validation set. The minimal breast cancer prediction model based on clinical and ultrasonic features possesses high clinical value, facilitating the early diagnosis of minimal breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.