ArticleWorld journal of experimental medicine2024
Value of autopsy in the modern age: Discrepancy between clinical and autopsy diagnoses.
Article in World journal of experimental medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Pathology of Cardiomyopathies: Bridging Morphology, Genomics, and Clinical Phenotypes.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Major discrepancy between clinical and autopsy diagnosis: a descriptive single-center analysis and its implications for the South African public health system.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Cardiovascular Diseases in Public Health: Chromosomal Abnormalities in Congenital Heart Disease Causing Sudden Cardiac Death in Children.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutopsy is a medical procedure that consists of the examination of the corpse to determine the cause of death and obtain information on pathological conditions or injuries. In recent years, there has been a reduction in hospital autopsies and an increase in forensic autopsies.
aimTo evaluate the utility of autopsy in the modern age and the discrepancy between clinical and autopsy diagnoses.
methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted on the reports of all 645 hospital autopsies performed at Polyclinic of Bari from 2006 to 2021.
resultsGroup A, 2006-2009, 174 cases were studied: 58% male, 58% adults, 55% neonatology; pulmonary disease was the cause of death in 23% of cases; and there was a discrepancy between clinical and autopsy diagnosis in 55% of cases. Group B, 2010-2013, 119 cases: 52% male, 46% infants, 48% neonatology; pulmonary disease was the cause of death in 25% of cases; and there was a discrepancy between clinical and autopsy diagnosis in 56% of cases. Group C, 2014-2017, 168 cases: sex equality, 37% infants, 25% gynecology; pulmonary disease was the cause of death in 24% of cases; and there was a discrepancy between clinical and autopsy diagnosis in 58% of cases. Group D, 2018-2021, 184 cases: 56% male, 38% adult, 32% gynecology; pulmonary disease was the cause of death in 27% of cases; and there was a discrepancy between clinical and autopsy diagnosis in 58% of cases.
conclusionThe study of hospital autopsies reveals a 56.75% discrepancy between clinical diagnosis and autopsy, highlighting the importance of autopsies, especially for fetal and neonatal diseases, which represent 59% of cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.