ReviewACS measurement science au2024
Considerations for Measurements of Aggregate PFAS Exposure in Precision Environmental Health.
Review in ACS measurement science au, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trifluoroacetic Acid (TFA) Exceeds All Other Extractable Organofluorine in Drinking Water from Eastern Massachusetts, United States.Environmental science & technology letters · 2026Article
- Large declines in organofluorine contamination indicated by subarctic marine mammal tissues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Evaluation and comparison of tools used to quantify aggregate PFAS exposure: Extractable organic fluorine, PFAS burden scores and summed PFAS concentrations.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025Article
- Organosilanized Hydrophobic Sand for Drought Resilience: Reducing Water Percolation and Enhancing Crop Growth Conditions.ACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have become a major focus of research due to their widespread environmental presence and adverse health effects associated with human exposure. PFAS include legacy and emerging structures and are characterized by a range of functional groups and carbon-fluorine chains that vary in length (from fewer than 3 carbons to more than 7 carbons). Research has linked PFAS exposure to an array of health concerns, ranging from developmental and reproductive disorders to immune system impairments and an increased risk of certain cancers. In this new era of personalized health, measuring markers of PFAS exposure in human biospecimens is an important part of environmental public health surveillance. PFAS are typically measured in human blood and tissues using targeted approaches, which quantify individual PFAS structures using specific instrumentation. The diversity and complexity of PFAS, the limitations of the targeted approaches due to the sheer number of structures, and the absence of publicly available analytical standards pose significant challenges for measurement methodologies. This perspective aims to describe aggregate PFAS exposure measurements and their potential for use in precision medicine applications including a discussion of the limitations and potential benefits of these aggregate measurements. As public health organizations, healthcare professionals, and the public look for guidance regarding the safe use of and exposure to PFAS, in a pragmatic cost-effective manner, the dynamic field of measurement science is poised to respond with innovative technological solutions to an important public health need.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.