Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39713005›Full record

ArticleHealth care transitions2023

Transition readiness measures for adolescents with chronic illness: A scoping review of new measures.

Tieghan Killackey, Fareha Nishat, Ellen Elsman, Erica Lawson, Lauren Kelenc, Jennifer N Stinson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health care transitions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Transition from adolescence to adulthood: Dedicated health services for young people with epilepsy in Italy.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026
    Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tieghan KillackeySchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Fareha NishatChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Ellen ElsmanChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Erica LawsonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
Lauren KelencChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Jennifer N StinsonChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The transition from pediatric to adult care settings for adolescents and young adults living with chronic conditions can be challenging and has been associated with declines in health and access to care. Well-validated measures of patients' transition readiness are critical, both for use in the clinical setting and to rigorously evaluate transition support programs for the purposes of research and health care quality improvement. Objectives: This review aimed to build off existing reviews and 1) identify and describe all newly developed and validated measures for the assessment of transition readiness for youth with chronic illness from the period of 2018-2022, and 2) evaluate their measurement properties and identify gaps in measurement testing. Methods: Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsychINFO to identify articles developing and validating transition readiness in individuals aged 12-26 years with a chronic illness between 2018 and 2022. Two reviewers independently selected articles for review and assessed quality of measurement properties. Results: 22 studies met inclusion criteria reporting on 21 different tools. 9 studies reported on the development and evaluation of a new tool, and 13 reported on the adaptation, modification, and/or translation of an existing tool. Most adapted tools were translations and adaptations of the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ) (n = 7). While some of these studies demonstrated sufficient internal consistency and structural validity, few met the COSMIN criteria for reliability and hypothesis testing and none met the criteria for cross-cultural validity. Criterion validity and measurement error were not assessed in any studies. Conclusion: Many new transition readiness measures continue to be developed in recent years, yet few have undergone rigorous psychometric evaluation. The TRAQ was the existing measure most often used as a model for developing new or modified tools. There remains a clear need for further validation of existing measures of patients' readiness to transition as opposed to continuing to develop new measures.

Indexed as

Adolescent chronic illnessTransition readiness measurementTransition to adult care

Identifiers

PMID39713005
PMCPMC11657346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.