ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2023
Late follow-up of neo-aortic dimensions and coronary arteries in adult patients after the arterial switch operation.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Revisiting the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction: A Case for Extraluminal Coronary Occlusion as a Distinct Entity.Annals of cardiac anaesthesia · 2026Article
- The Initial Diagnostic Approach to Adult Congenital Heart Disease: A Practical Imaging Pathway for General Cardiologists and Cardiac Imagers.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2026Review
- Arterial switch operation: A surgical triumph with long-term management challenges.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: After the arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries (TGA), neo-aortic dilatation and coronary arterial anomalies, especially an interarterial course and acute coronary artery take-off angle, are commonly found. Long-term follow-up data after ASO is scarce. Aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of neo-aortic dilatation and coronary abnormalities, with special emphasis on acute coronary take-off angle, in adult TGA-ASO patients. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, all adult TGA-ASO patients with ≥1 CT-angiography (CTA) at the age of ≥16 years were included. Results: Eighty-one patients, 69 % male and median age 21.0 [18.5-22.8] years, were included. At baseline, maximum neo-aortic diameter was 39.2 ± 5.3 mm; 35 (43 %) patients had neo-aortic dilatation (neo-aortic diameter of >40 mm), 22 (27 %) patients had an acute coronary take-off angle (<30°), and 5 (6 %) patients had an interarterial course of the RCA (2 %) or LCA (4 %). Neo-aortic or coronary artery re-intervention occurred in 10 (12 %) patients. All 10 patients had neo-aortic dilatation or coronary take-off angle of <30° on baseline CTA. Conclusion: This study reports a prevalence of 43 % of neo-aortic dilatation, 6 % of interarterial coronary course and 27 % for acute coronary take-off angle (<30°) at a median term of 21.0 years post ASO. All patients with a neo-aortic re-intervention or coronary artery re-intervention during follow-up had a maximum neo-aortic diameter of >40 mm or a coronary take-off angle of <30° at baseline CTA. This hypothesis generating study suggests that an active surveillance in patients with neo-aortic dilation and/or an acute angulation of < 30° post ASO might be considered and requires prospective evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.