ReviewJournal of pathology informatics2024
Artificial intelligence (AI) for tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor budding (TB) identification in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of pathology informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Pathology and the AI-Based Quantification of the Tumor Microenvironment in Gastrointestinal Cancer: From Tumor Budding and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes to Tertiary Lymphoid Structures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Spatial Immunometabolic Analysis of the Tumor Microenvironment: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Tumor Budding in Colorectal Carcinoma-From Incidental Observation to Prognostic Marker: Lessons Learned from Colorectal Cancer Assessment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Distance-based evaluation of tumor budding in colorectal cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Reveals the Association Between Gene Expression and Immune Infiltration in Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Study From Single-Cell to Survival Analysis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic Role of Worst Pattern of Invasion in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning-driven advancements in gastrointestinal cancer: Paving the way for precision medicine.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Exploratory analysis of tumor budding density in resected synchronous and metachronous colorectal liver metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- PD-1/PD-L1 Cancer Immunotherapeutics Reshape Tumor Microenvironment - Clinical Evidence and Molecular Mechanisms for AI-based Precision Medicine.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
- Cancer stem cells: landscape, challenges and emerging therapeutic innovations.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluation of the parameters such as tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor budding (TB) is one of the most important steps in colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis and cancer development prognosis. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been successfully used to solve such problems. In this paper, we summarize the latest data on the use of artificial intelligence to predict tumor microenvironment and tumor budding in histological scans of patients with colorectal cancer. We performed a systematic literature search using 2 databases (Medline and Scopus) with the following search terms: ("tumor microenvironment" OR "tumor budding") AND ("colorectal cancer" OR CRC) AND ("artificial intelligence" OR "machine learning " OR "deep learning"). During the analysis, we gathered from the articles performance scores such as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of identifying TME and TB using artificial intelligence. The systematic review showed that machine learning and deep learning successfully cope with the prediction of these parameters. The highest accuracy values in TB and TME prediction were 97.7% and 97.3%, respectively. This review led us to the conclusion that AI platforms can already be used as diagnostic aids, which will greatly facilitate the work of pathologists in detection and estimation of TB and TME as instruments and second-opinion services. A key limitation in writing this systematic review was the heterogeneous use of performance metrics for machine learning models by different authors, as well as relatively small datasets used in some studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.