Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712977›Full record

ReviewJournal of pathology informatics2024

Artificial intelligence (AI) for tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor budding (TB) identification in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients: A systematic review.

Olga Andreevna Lobanova, Anastasia Olegovna Kolesnikova, Valeria Aleksandrovna Ponomareva, Ksenia Andreevna Vekhova, Anaida Lusparonovna Shaginyan, Alisa Borisovna Semenova, Dmitry Petrovich Nekhoroshkov, Svetlana Evgenievna Kochetkova, Natalia Valeryevna Kretova, Alexander Sergeevich Zanozin and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pathology informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Distance-based evaluation of tumor budding in colorectal cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Olga Andreevna LobanovaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Anastasia Olegovna KolesnikovaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Valeria Aleksandrovna PonomarevaLLC "Intelligent analytics", Moscow, Russia.
Ksenia Andreevna VekhovaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Anaida Lusparonovna ShaginyanI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Alisa Borisovna SemenovaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry Petrovich NekhoroshkovLLC "Intelligent analytics", Moscow, Russia.
Svetlana Evgenievna KochetkovaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Natalia Valeryevna KretovaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander Sergeevich ZanozinI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Maria Alekseevna PeshkovaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Natalia Borisovna SerezhnikovaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Nikolay Vladimirovich ZharkovI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Evgeniya Altarovna KoganI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander Alekseevich BiryukovI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina Evgenievna RudenkoI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Tatiana Alexandrovna DemuraI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya street, 8, p. 2, 119991 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation of the parameters such as tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor budding (TB) is one of the most important steps in colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis and cancer development prognosis. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been successfully used to solve such problems. In this paper, we summarize the latest data on the use of artificial intelligence to predict tumor microenvironment and tumor budding in histological scans of patients with colorectal cancer. We performed a systematic literature search using 2 databases (Medline and Scopus) with the following search terms: ("tumor microenvironment" OR "tumor budding") AND ("colorectal cancer" OR CRC) AND ("artificial intelligence" OR "machine learning " OR "deep learning"). During the analysis, we gathered from the articles performance scores such as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of identifying TME and TB using artificial intelligence. The systematic review showed that machine learning and deep learning successfully cope with the prediction of these parameters. The highest accuracy values in TB and TME prediction were 97.7% and 97.3%, respectively. This review led us to the conclusion that AI platforms can already be used as diagnostic aids, which will greatly facilitate the work of pathologists in detection and estimation of TB and TME as instruments and second-opinion services. A key limitation in writing this systematic review was the heterogeneous use of performance metrics for machine learning models by different authors, as well as relatively small datasets used in some studies.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceColorectal cancerSystematic reviewTumor buddingTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID39712977
PMCPMC11662261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.