ArticleGenetics in medicine open2024
Rapid genomic testing in critically ill pediatric patients: Genetic counseling lessons from a national program.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiencing acute genomic care: perspectives from parents in the neonatal and paediatric intensive care units towards rapid genomic sequencing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Blurring the lines: an empirical examination of the interrelationships among acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Genetic counseling around the globe: Promoting international cooperation and collaboration.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic counselors (GCs) face unique challenges in the acute care setting. Acute care environments-such as neonatal and pediatric intensive care units-are characterized by urgency, complexity, and rapid decision making. These settings require GCs to navigate a delicate balance between addressing the immediate clinical needs of patients and providing comprehensive genetic information to families, while demanding adaptation of existing skills for practice. Rapid genomic testing (rGT) is increasingly becoming standard of care in acute care. GCs are well placed to support families through the rGT process. Despite this, there is a lack of consistency in the provision of comprehensive acute care genetic counseling globally and a subsequent need for professional guidance in this area. The Acute Care Genomics study piloted a national approach to delivering rGT for infants and children admitted to intensive care units in Australia with suspected genetic conditions between 2018 and 2022. GCs from across Australia were involved in both pre- and post-test counseling for the families of these critically unwell children. Based on our collective experience of delivering this national rGT program, this article provides a discussion of common challenges for health professionals new to delivering rGT in intensive care. We share some practical solutions and make recommendations for supporting families in this area of practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.