ArticleGenetics in medicine open2024
Genetic counseling workforce diversity, inclusion, and capacity in Australia and New Zealand.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Counseling in Aotearoa New Zealand: Context, Practice and the Future of Genomic Healthcare.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Factors That Influence Genetic Counselors' Professional Identity-A Qualitative Study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Preparing healthcare providers to use polygenic risk scores: a qualitative study of learning needs and educational preferences.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Relational work in implementation: a qualitative analysis of intra- and inter- professional strategies leveraged in genomic multidisciplinary teams.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Achieving cultural safety in genetic counseling for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- The evolving role of genetic counselors in South Africa: A decade of growth.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- How can a community of practice support healthcare professionals navigating new roles? a case study of genetic counsellors employed to work in medical specialities.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Delivering Trio Germline Whole Genome Sequencing to Patients Newly Diagnosed With Childhood Cancer: Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives of the PREDICT Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- A mixed-methods assessment of the Australasian Society of Genetic Counselors (ASGC) Mentor Program.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
- Genetic counseling around the globe: Promoting international cooperation and collaboration.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
- The global status of genetic counselors in 2023: What has changed in the past 5 years?Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To understand diversity, inclusion, and capacity of genetic counselors (GCs) in Australasia (Australia and New Zealand). Methods: Individuals with or working toward a GC qualification in Australasia were invited to complete an online survey, between November 2022 and March 2023. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, 1-sample proportion Results: A total of 252 participants responded to the survey. A subset analysis of respondents residing in Australia demonstrated a lack of representation across various characteristics including sex, relationship status, caregiver status, location, country of birth, Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander identity, language, and religion. Analysis of the full data set demonstrated that most respondents also perceived that the workforce was not representative across gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, or disability. Respondents provided examples of existing inclusive practice. They also suggested workforce needs, such as promoting education and employment for minority communities, more visible diversity, accessible services for clients, and professional development for GCs. Using survey and reference data, we estimated approximately 346 full-time equivalent GCs working in clinical practice in Australasia. Conclusion: Our study provides a first step in illuminating GC workforce changes needed in Australasia regarding diversity, inclusion, and capacity. The survey may be of use internationally, enabling other countries to understand these issues within their jurisdiction, and supporting the international community in addressing these challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.