Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712857›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Comparative Study Between Medical/Surgical Intensive Care Units vs. Mixed Intensive Care Units in Key Performance Indicators.

Mohammed I Alarifi, Omnia Ali Ibrahim Mostafa, Rashid Alballaa, Rakan M Alqahtani, Nasser A Almutawa, Faisal Almutawa, Renad A Almutawa, Rema A Almutawa, Elaf Almusahel, Lama Alyahya and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mohammed I AlarifiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Omnia Ali Ibrahim MostafaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Rashid AlballaaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Rakan M AlqahtaniDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Nasser A AlmutawaCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Faisal AlmutawaDepartment of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, SAU.
Renad A AlmutawaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Rema A AlmutawaCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Elaf AlmusahelCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Lama AlyahyaCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Maha M AlNahdiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdulrahman AlsaadonDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Mohamad-Hani TemsahPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, King Saud University Medical City, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background This comparative study evaluates the performance of medical/surgical and mixed intensive care units (ICUs) at a tertiary care university hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using key performance indicators (KPIs). Since its establishment in 1982, the hospital has provided comprehensive medical services, including specialized, closed-model ICUs, including medical, surgical, and pediatric ICUs. In 2021, these ICUs transitioned to a mixed ICU model to enhance efficiency and patient care. This study aims to assess the impact of this transition on various KPIs, including mortality rate, ICU length of stay (LOS), bed occupancy rate (bOR), ICU readmission rate within 48 hours, unplanned extubation, glycemic control, and delayed ICU discharge. Methodology Data from 2018 to 2022 were analyzed, comparing the separate medical and surgical ICUs model (2018-2020) with the mixed ICU model (2021-2022). Statistical analyses were performed, including independent t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA), to determine significant differences between the ICU models. Results The transition to the mixed ICU model significantly improved several KPIs. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) decreased from 0.575 in the specialized ICU model to 0.399 in the mixed ICU model, reflecting a marked improvement in patient outcomes. The average LOS also reduced from 4.989 days in the specialized ICUs to 4.481 days in the mixed ICU model. Additionally, the bOR significantly dropped from 91.00% to 72.08% (

Indexed as

bed occupancy ratecontinuous monitoringdelayed icu dischargehere are 10 suggested s: mixed icu modelhospital efficiencyicu performancekey performance indicatorslength of staymortality ratereadmission rate

Identifiers

PMID39712857
PMCPMC11661697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.