Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712847›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Assessment of Self-Medication Practices and Knowledge Among Medical Students in Chengalpattu District: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Nishanth Kumaran Shri P M, Vedapriya Dande Rajasekar, Jasmine M, Surya B N, Suganthi S, Vijayalakshmi S, Geethanjali Murthy, Kesavan Sundaraboopathy, Arun Kumar R, Harishma Ramesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nishanth Kumaran Shri P MCommunity Medicine, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, IND.
Vedapriya Dande RajasekarCommunity Medicine, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, IND.
Jasmine MCommunity Medicine, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, IND.
Surya B NCommunity Medicine, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, IND.
Suganthi SCommunity Medicine, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute (SBV) Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Ammapettai, IND.
Vijayalakshmi SCommunity Medicine, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, IND.
Geethanjali MurthyCommunity Medicine, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, IND.
Kesavan SundaraboopathyCommunity Medicine, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, IND.
Arun Kumar RCommunity Medicine, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, IND.
Harishma RameshCommunity Medicine, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe practice of self-medication is wherein individuals initiate the use of medications without consulting a healthcare professional. College life is a period marked by academic, social, and personal changes. Due to their greater freedom and the pressure of academic success, students face various health issues. In reaction to perceived health concerns, college students often self-medicate by using over-the-counter or even medicines without medical consultation. Factors such as desire for quick relief and lack of awareness can contribute to self-medication. Mental health concerns, such as stress, anxiety, and depression, may drive students to self-medicate as a coping mechanism.

aimThe aim of the study is to estimate the prevalence of self-medication among young adults, determine the reasons, extent, and practice of self-medication, and assess self-medication practices, knowledge, and attitudes among medical students. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional study was used to collect data on the prevalence of self-medication and associated risk factors among college students from a tertiary private medical college in Chengalpattu district between January and March 2024. For the academic year 2023-24, approximately 1,000 students were registered across the first, second, third, and final years of the college. Using a simple random sampling technique, a total of 450 eligible undergraduate medical students were randomly selected. Informed consent was obtained from the participants before the start of the study. All undergraduate students aged 18 and above were included in the study. Students with chronic diseases requiring regular prescription medications and who were not willing to participate were excluded from the study.

resultsThe prevalence of self-medication among medical college students was 66.2%. Among the study participants, 45.6% of students had adequate knowledge about self-medication. Around 51% of participants had an attitude that self-medication is acceptable for minor illnesses. In terms of practice, cough syrup was the most frequently used, with 175 (58.7%) of participants reporting its use. Factors such as year of study, gender and self-medication practice had a significant association with knowledge about self-medication.

conclusionSelf-medication poses a growing risk to individuals' physical health and overall well-being. Hence, it is crucial to encourage responsible medication use and emphasize the importance of consulting healthcare professionals before taking any medication. If left unaddressed, self-medication practices can lead to severe health consequences and undermine the quality of life.

Indexed as

attitudecollege studentsdrug utilizationhealth literacyself-medication

Identifiers

PMID39712847
PMCPMC11663294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.