ReviewCureus2024
The Efficacy of Neuromodulation, Interventional Treatment and Unconventional Therapies in the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in managing refractory upper-extremity pain.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- White matter tracts involved in complex regional pain syndrome after subcortical stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic debilitating multisystem neuropathic pain disorder. It is characterized by continuous pain, usually out of proportion to any known tissue injury, vasomotor changes, sudomotor or edema, and motor or trophic changes. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of neuromodulation, interventional, and unconventional treatments for CRPS. The primary focus is pain reduction, assessed through various scales, with secondary outcomes examining effects on autonomic, sensory, motor, and psychological aspects, and quality of life. PubMed, Cochrane Library, MDPI, and ScienceDirect databases were thoroughly searched using our detailed search strategy and relevant literature compiled. Articles were assessed using our eligibility criteria and quality appraisal tools. All types of study designs were considered. Initially, 463 articles were identified; after a thorough assessment, 23 articles comprising 2307 patients were shortlisted. Neuromodulation interventions, specifically Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) and Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) demonstrated statistically significant pain reduction (43-82% and up to 70%, respectively). Both modalities demonstrate improvement in secondary outcomes and quality of life. Interventional interventions, specifically nerve blockade ranging from sympathetic, stellate ganglion, and regional nerve blocks, all demonstrate varying levels of efficacy on measured pain and secondary outcomes. Unconventional: Botulinum toxin injections through multiple delivery systems demonstrated varying levels of efficacy in treating pain and improving secondary outcomes. In conclusion, DRG stimulation and SCS, nerve blockade, and botulinum toxin all display promise in alleviating symptoms of CRPS. Definite conclusions were not made due to a lack of clinical trial data, and longer multi-year follow-up is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.